Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27956847›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2016

Predictors for Moderate to Severe Acute Postoperative Pain after Cesarean Section.

Natalia de Carvalho Borges, Lilian Varanda Pereira, Louise Amália de Moura, Thuany Cavalcante Silva, Charlise Fortunato Pedroso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Australian Women's Experiences of Establishing Breastfeeding after Caesarean Birth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia de Carvalho BorgesFaculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Rua 227 Qd, 68, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1371-0066
Lilian Varanda PereiraFaculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Rua 227 Qd, 68, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4604-0238
Louise Amália de MouraFaculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Rua 227 Qd, 68, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9636-2975
Thuany Cavalcante SilvaFaculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Rua 227 Qd, 68, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Charlise Fortunato PedrosoFaculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Rua 227 Qd, 68, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalgesicsAnalysis of VarianceAnxietyBrazilCesarean SectionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidencePain MeasurementPostoperative PainPredictive Value of TestsYoung AdultAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID27956847
PMCPMC5121467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.