ReviewVeterinary world2016
Laboratory animal models for esophageal cancer.
Review in Veterinary world, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishing a rabbit sham model of cervical esophageal surgery for circumferential esophageal transplantation.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026Article
- Bioengineered Approaches for Esophageal Regeneration: Advancing Esophageal Cancer Therapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Esophageal adenocarcinoma models: a closer look.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Review
- DNA methylation markers in esophageal cancer: an emerging tool for cancer surveillance and treatment.American journal of cancer research · 2021Review
- Understanding Esophageal Cancer: The Challenges and Opportunities for the Next Decade.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Tumor xenograft animal models for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of biomedical science · 2018Review
- MicroRNA-195 inhibits human gastric cancer by directly targeting basic fibroblast growth factor.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017Article
- Direct Downregulation of B-Cell Translocation Gene 3 by microRNA-93 Is Required for Desensitizing Esophageal Cancer to Radiotherapy.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of esophageal cancer is rapidly increasing especially in developing countries. The major risk factors include unhealthy lifestyle practices such as alcohol consumption, smoking, and chewing tobacco to name a few. Diagnosis at an advanced stage and poor prognosis make esophageal cancer one of the most lethal diseases. These factors have urged further research in understanding the pathophysiology of the disease. Animal models not only aid in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of esophageal cancer but also help in developing therapeutic interventions for the disease. This review throws light on the various recent laboratory animal models for esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.