Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27956632›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Increased burden of deleterious variants in essential genes in autism spectrum disorder.

Xiao Ji, Rachel L Kember, Christopher D Brown, Maja Bućan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Essential genes: a cross-species perspective.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao JiGenomics and Computational Biology Graduate Group, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0001-5908-2774
Rachel L KemberDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Christopher D BrownDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; chrbro@mail.med.upenn.edu bucan@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Maja BućanDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; chrbro@mail.med.upenn.edu bucan@mail.med.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Genomic analysis of bipolar disorder in a genetic isolateR01MH093415 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUCAN, MAJA · 2011 to 2014
$3.5M
Identification and validation of cell specific eQTLs by Bayesian modelingR01MH101822 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BROWN, CHRISTOPHER DAVID, ENGELHARDT, BARBARA · 2013 to 2016
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093415NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous, highly heritable neurodevelopmental syndrome characterized by impaired social interaction, communication, and repetitive behavior. It is estimated that hundreds of genes contribute to ASD. We asked if genes with a strong effect on survival and fitness contribute to ASD risk. Human orthologs of genes with an essential role in pre- and postnatal development in the mouse [essential genes (EGs)] are enriched for disease genes and under strong purifying selection relative to human orthologs of mouse genes with a known nonlethal phenotype [nonessential genes (NEGs)]. This intolerance to deleterious mutations, commonly observed haploinsufficiency, and the importance of EGs in development suggest a possible cumulative effect of deleterious variants in EGs on complex neurodevelopmental disorders. With a comprehensive catalog of 3,915 mammalian EGs, we provide compelling evidence for a stronger contribution of EGs to ASD risk compared with NEGs. By examining the exonic de novo and inherited variants from 1,781 ASD quartet families, we show a significantly higher burden of damaging mutations in EGs in ASD probands compared with their non-ASD siblings. The analysis of EGs in the developing brain identified clusters of coexpressed EGs implicated in ASD. Finally, we suggest a high-priority list of 29 EGs with potential ASD risk as targets for future functional and behavioral studies. Overall, we show that large-scale studies of gene function in model organisms provide a powerful approach for prioritization of genes and pathogenic variants identified by sequencing studies of human disease.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionGenes, EssentialMutationAllelesAnimalsAutism Spectrum DisorderBrainChild Development Disorders, PervasiveExonsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiceautism spectrum disordercoexpression modulesessential genesmouse knockoutsmutational burden

Identifiers

PMID27956632
PMCPMC5206557
OpenAlexW2563735921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.