ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2016
Differential Radiographic Appearance of BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Patients Matched by Primary Tumor Location.
Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Appendiceal Cancer with Systematic Metastasis without Gastrointestinal Symptoms Found by Subcutaneous Tumor.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram for the pre-operative prediction of BRAF mutation and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer: a double-center study.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Survival comparison of first-line treatment regimens in patients with braf-mutated advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- DNA and RNA Alterations Associated with Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- COLORECTAL CANCER: HISTOPATHOLOGICAL PROFILE AND PREVALENCE OF DNA REPAIR SYSTEM DEFICIENCY IN PATIENTS SUBMITTED TO SURGICAL TREATMENT IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023Article
- The implication of BRAF mutation in advanced colorectal cancer.Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- The Real-Life Data of BRAF Mutation on the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: a TOG Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021Article
- BRAFV600E Mutations Arising from a Left-Side Primary in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Are They a Distinct Subset?Targeted oncology · 2021Article
- Applying Precision to the Management of BRAF-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Targeted oncology · 2020Review
- Being Present: A single-arm feasibility study of audio-based mindfulness meditation for colorectal cancer patients and caregivers.PloS one · 2018Article
- Emerging treatment options forGastrointestinal cancer : targets and therapy · 2018Article
- BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: What Is the Optimal Strategy for Treatment?Current treatment options in oncology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) share many clinicopathologic features with right-sided colon tumors, including frequent peritoneal involvement. Because of the poorer outcomes associated with BRAF mutations, early enrollment in clinical trials has been encouraged. However, the use of standard eligibility and assessment criteria, such as measurable disease, has anecdotally impeded patient accrual and restricted appraisal of treatment response. We investigated whether the presence of a BRAF V600E mutation is differentially associated with sites and appearance of metastatic disease in patients matched by primary tumor location.
methodsA total of 40 patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC were matched to 80 patients with BRAF wild-type mCRC by location of primary tumor (right or left colon; rectum), sex, and age. Associations between BRAF mutation status and clinicopathologic characteristics and metastatic sites were analyzed using proportion tests. Survival was summarized with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.
resultsThe distribution of primary tumor locations was: 60% right colon, 30% left colon, and 10% rectum. Compared with BRAF wild-type tumors, BRAF-mutant tumors more commonly associated with peritoneal metastases (50% vs 31%; P=.045) and ascites (50% vs 24%; P=.0038). In patients with left colon primaries, BRAF mutations were associated with more frequent ascites (58% vs 12%; P=.0038) and less frequent liver metastases (42% vs 79%; P=.024). Among patients with right colon primaries, no significant difference in sites of disease by BRAF mutation status was observed. Disease was not measurable by RECIST 1.1 in 24% of patients with right-sided primary tumors, irrespective of BRAF mutation status. In the BRAF-mutated cohort, ascites correlated unfavorably with survival (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.14, 4.83; P=.02).
conclusionsGreater frequency of ascites and peritoneal metastases, which pose challenges for RECIST 1.1 interpretation of therapeutic outcomes, are seen with BRAF-mutant mCRC, even when patients are matched for primary tumor location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.