Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27956538›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2016

Differential Radiographic Appearance of BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Patients Matched by Primary Tumor Location.

Chloe E Atreya, Claire Greene, Ryan M McWhirter, Nabia S Ikram, I Elaine Allen, Katherine Van Loon, Alan P Venook, Benjamin M Yeh, Spencer C Behr

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Emerging treatment options forGastrointestinal cancer : targets and therapy · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chloe E AtreyaFrom the Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Claire GreeneFrom the Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Ryan M McWhirterFrom the Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Nabia S IkramFrom the Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
I Elaine AllenFrom the Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Katherine Van LoonFrom the Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Alan P VenookFrom the Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Benjamin M YehFrom the Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Spencer C BehrFrom the Department of Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Targeting of Aberrant Signaling in Patient-Derived Colorectal Cancer ModelsK08CA175153 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ATREYA, CHLOE E. · 2013 to 2017
$867k
Targeting GITR for Tumor ImmunotherapyK08CA127143 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI COHEN, ADAM D · 2007 to 2008
$276k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA127143NCI NIH HHS K08 CA175153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) share many clinicopathologic features with right-sided colon tumors, including frequent peritoneal involvement. Because of the poorer outcomes associated with BRAF mutations, early enrollment in clinical trials has been encouraged. However, the use of standard eligibility and assessment criteria, such as measurable disease, has anecdotally impeded patient accrual and restricted appraisal of treatment response. We investigated whether the presence of a BRAF V600E mutation is differentially associated with sites and appearance of metastatic disease in patients matched by primary tumor location.

methodsA total of 40 patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC were matched to 80 patients with BRAF wild-type mCRC by location of primary tumor (right or left colon; rectum), sex, and age. Associations between BRAF mutation status and clinicopathologic characteristics and metastatic sites were analyzed using proportion tests. Survival was summarized with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

resultsThe distribution of primary tumor locations was: 60% right colon, 30% left colon, and 10% rectum. Compared with BRAF wild-type tumors, BRAF-mutant tumors more commonly associated with peritoneal metastases (50% vs 31%; P=.045) and ascites (50% vs 24%; P=.0038). In patients with left colon primaries, BRAF mutations were associated with more frequent ascites (58% vs 12%; P=.0038) and less frequent liver metastases (42% vs 79%; P=.024). Among patients with right colon primaries, no significant difference in sites of disease by BRAF mutation status was observed. Disease was not measurable by RECIST 1.1 in 24% of patients with right-sided primary tumors, irrespective of BRAF mutation status. In the BRAF-mutated cohort, ascites correlated unfavorably with survival (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.14, 4.83; P=.02).

conclusionsGreater frequency of ascites and peritoneal metastases, which pose challenges for RECIST 1.1 interpretation of therapeutic outcomes, are seen with BRAF-mutant mCRC, even when patients are matched for primary tumor location.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAscitesBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationPeritoneal NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID27956538
PMCPMC5551390
OpenAlexW2563122469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.