ReviewClinical medicine (London, England)2016
Lymphoma: turning biology into cures.
Review in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and Synthesis of Protocatechuic Acid Derivatives for Potential Tumoricidal Effect against Hematological Malignancies.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase is a novel target for diffuse large B cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma.Blood cancer journal · 2019Article
- The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome: a new promising target in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma.British journal of cancer · 2019Article
- Lnc SMAD5-AS1 as ceRNA inhibit proliferation of diffuse large B cell lymphoma via Wnt/β-catenin pathway by sponging miR-135b-5p to elevate expression of APC.Cell death & disease · 2019Article
- Association between abnormal serum free light chains ratio and known prognostic factors in lymphoma; a nephrology viewpoint.Journal of renal injury prevention · 2017Article
- Clinicopathological significance of miR-101-3p and c-myc mRNA expression in diffused large B-cell lymphoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the commonest aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma with approximately 5,000 cases annually in the UK. The R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) regimen has become the international standard of care with cure rates of around 75% and despite extensive studies aimed at improving the outcomes, R-CHOP has not been superseded. Those patients that do not respond to R-CHOP have a poor outlook. DLBCL is a disease with marked molecular heterogeneity; advances in gene expression profiling and mutational analysis can be used to increase our understanding of the disease and identify new therapeutic targets. Precision medicine using new agents, including small molecule inhibitors, is now being investigated for DLBCL. Progress in this disease is likely to come by targeting heterogeneous subtypes through novel combinations. Where R-CHOP fails, we hope that these new approaches can succeed by providing personalised medicine using precision diagnostics to guide new treatment paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.