Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27956439›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine (London, England)2016

Heart failure - what's new and what's changed?

Paul D Callan, Andrew L Clark

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul D CallanAdvanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK paulcallan843@btinternet.com.
Andrew L ClarkHull York Medical School and honorary consultant cardiologist, Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Hospitals Trust, York, UK.
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicians responsible for the care of patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction have access to a broad range of evidence-based treatments that prolong life and reduce symptoms. In spite of the significant progress made over the last four decades, there is an ongoing need for novel therapies to treat a condition that is associated with stubbornly high morbidity and mortality. In this article, we discuss the findings of SERVE-HF, a randomised controlled trial of adaptive servo-ventilation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, as well as EMPA-REG, a study of the effects of a novel diabetic agent that may be of greater interest to heart failure specialists than diabetologists. We also examine further analyses of the groundbreaking PARADIGM-HF trial, which attempt to answer some of the unresolved questions from the original study of the first combined angiotensin-receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitor, sacubitril valsartan. The recently published National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for the management of acute heart failure and plans to introduce best practice tariffs bring into focus the need for well-organised, multidisciplinary care. We discuss the challenges involved in developing and delivering a specialist service that meets the needs of a growing population of patients living with heart failure.

Indexed as

Heart FailureAgedAged, 80 and overAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDiabetes ComplicationsDrug CombinationsHumansPositive-Pressure RespirationPractice Guidelines as TopicSleep Apnea, CentralTetrazolesValsartanAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug Combinationssacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationTetrazolesValsartanAdaptive servo-ventilationangiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitorsclinical trialsdiabetes mellitusheart failureorganisation of care

Identifiers

PMID27956439
PMCPMC6329563
OpenAlexW2562673923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.