Letter to the editor: Comments on Stuart et al. (2016): "Myosin content of individual human muscle fibers isolated by laser capture microdissection".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. MicroRNA-494-3p inhibits formation of fast oxidative muscle fibres by targeting E1A-binding protein p300 in human-induced pluripotent stem cells.Scientific reports · 2021
   Article
2. Reply to "Letter to the editor: Comments on Stuart et al. (2016): 'Myosin content of individual human muscle fibers isolated by laser capture microdissection'".American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Reply to "Letter to the editor: Comments on Stuart et al. (2016): 'Myosin content of individual human muscle fibers isolated by laser capture microdissection'".2016
• Comment on
  Myosin content of individual human muscle fibers isolated by laser capture microdissection.2016

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as