Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27956239›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2017

RNAcompete methodology and application to determine sequence preferences of unconventional RNA-binding proteins.

Debashish Ray, Kevin C H Ha, Kate Nie, Hong Zheng, Timothy R Hughes, Quaid D Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debashish RayTerrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada.
Kevin C H HaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Kate NieDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Hong ZhengTerrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada.
Timothy R HughesTerrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada. Electronic address: t.hughes@utoronto.ca.
Quaid D MorrisTerrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada; Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G4, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada. Electronic address: quaid.morris@utoronto.ca.
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

Systematic characterization of unconventional RNA binding proteinsR01HG008613 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · PI BLENCOWE, BENJAMIN, GREENBLATT, JACK · 2015 to 2017
$1.0M
CIHR MOP-125894NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) participate in diverse cellular processes and have important roles in human development and disease. The human genome, and that of many other eukaryotes, encodes hundreds of RBPs that contain canonical sequence-specific RNA-binding domains (RBDs) as well as numerous other unconventional RNA binding proteins (ucRBPs). ucRBPs physically associate with RNA but lack common RBDs. The degree to which these proteins bind RNA, in a sequence specific manner, is unknown. Here, we provide a detailed description of both the laboratory and data processing methods for RNAcompete, a method we have previously used to analyze the RNA binding preferences of hundreds of RBD-containing RBPs, from diverse eukaryotes. We also determine the RNA-binding preferences for two human ucRBPs, NUDT21 and CNBP, and use this analysis to exemplify the RNAcompete pipeline. The results of our RNAcompete experiments are consistent with independent RNA-binding data for these proteins and demonstrate the utility of RNAcompete for analyzing the growing repertoire of ucRBPs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesCleavage And Polyadenylation Specificity FactorCloning, MolecularDNA PrimersDrosophila melanogasterEscherichia coliGene ExpressionHumansMicroarray AnalysisProtein BindingProtein DomainsRecombinant ProteinsRNARNA-Binding ProteinsCleavage And Polyadenylation Specificity FactorCNBP protein, humanDNA PrimersNudt21 protein, humanRecombinant ProteinsRNARNA-Binding ProteinsBinding siteCNBPDNA microarrayNUDT21RNA-binding proteinRNAcompete

Identifiers

PMID27956239
PMCPMC5411283
OpenAlexW2560785030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.