Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27956060›Full record

ReviewTrends in parasitology2017

Plasmodium vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection - Progress and Prospects.

Ruth O Payne, Paul M Griffin, James S McCarthy, Simon J Draper

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in parasitology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05071079 (A Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Feasibility of Controlled Blood-stage Plasmodium Vivax Human Malaria Infection Through Experimental Inoculation of Cryopreserved Infected Erythrocytes in Healthy Thai Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05071079 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Feasibility of Controlled Blood-stage Plasmodium Vivax Human Malaria Infection Through Experimental Inoculation of Cryopreserved Infected Erythrocytes in Healthy Thai Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2022 to 2026Enrolled48ConditionsPlasmodium Vivax InfectionArmsAn inoculum of malaria parasitised red blood cells with whole dose blood-stage inoculum, An inoculum of malaria parasitised red blood cells with 1:5 dilution blood-stage inoculum, An inoculum of malaria parasitised red blood cells with 1:10 dilution blood-stage inoculum, An inoculum of malaria parasitised red blood cells with 1:20 dilution blood-stage inoculum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterizing Blood-Stage Antimalarial Drug MIC ValuesAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Controlled Human Malaria Infection Studies in Africa-Past, Present, and Future.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. The challenges ofFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Plasmodium vivax pre-erythrocytic vaccines.Parasitology international · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Progress towards the development of aExpert review of vaccines · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruth O PayneThe Jenner Institute Laboratories, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK; The Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK. Electronic address: ruth.payne@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Paul M GriffinQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Rd, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; Q-Pharm Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Mater Hospital and Mater Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
James S McCarthyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Rd, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Simon J DraperThe Jenner Institute Laboratories, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK. Electronic address: simon.draper@ndm.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100086Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) clinical trials have almost entirely focussed on Plasmodium falciparum, providing a highly informative means to investigate host-pathogen interactions as well as assess potential new prophylactic and therapeutic interventions. However, in recent years, there has been renewed interest in Plasmodium vivax, with CHMI models developed by groups in Colombia, the USA, and Australia. This review summarizes the published experiences, and examines the advantages and disadvantages of the different models that initiate infection either by mosquito bite or using a blood-stage inoculum. As for P. falciparum, CHMI studies with P. vivax will provide a platform for early proof-of-concept testing of drugs and vaccines, accelerating the development of novel interventions.

Indexed as

AnimalsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxModels, BiologicalPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium vivaxCHMIIBSMmalariavivax

Identifiers

PMID27956060
PMCPMC5270241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.