Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27955713›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2016

Rare and common epilepsies converge on a shared gene regulatory network providing opportunities for novel antiepileptic drug discovery.

Andree Delahaye-Duriez, Prashant Srivastava, Kirill Shkura, Sarah R Langley, Liisi Laaniste, Aida Moreno-Moral, Bénédicte Danis, Manuela Mazzuferi, Patrik Foerch, Elena V Gazina and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Real-life survey of pitfalls and successes of precision medicine in genetic epilepsies.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2021
    Observational
  15. Review
  16. Gene Editing and Modulation: the Holy Grail for the Genetic Epilepsies?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Andree Delahaye-DuriezDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London, UK. a.delahaye-duriez@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4324-7372
Prashant SrivastavaDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.
Kirill ShkuraDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.
Sarah R LangleyDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.
Liisi LaanisteDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.
Aida Moreno-MoralMRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Bénédicte DanisNeuroscience TA, UCB Pharma, S.A, Allée de la Recherche, 60, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Manuela MazzuferiNeuroscience TA, UCB Pharma, S.A, Allée de la Recherche, 60, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Patrik FoerchNeuroscience TA, UCB Pharma, S.A, Allée de la Recherche, 60, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Elena V GazinaThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Kay RichardsThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Steven PetrouThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Rafal M KaminskiNeuroscience TA, UCB Pharma, S.A, Allée de la Recherche, 60, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Enrico PetrettoMRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK. enrico.petretto@duke-nus.edu.sg.
Michael R JohnsonDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London, UK. m.johnson@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BEDuke-NUS Medical School · SGThe University of Melbourne · AUAustralian Research Council · AUInserm · FR

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/11/25/28740Medical Research Council MC_U120097112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between monogenic and polygenic forms of epilepsy is poorly understood and the extent to which the genetic and acquired epilepsies share common pathways is unclear. Here, we use an integrated systems-level analysis of brain gene expression data to identify molecular networks disrupted in epilepsy.

resultsWe identified a co-expression network of 320 genes (M30), which is significantly enriched for non-synonymous de novo mutations ascertained from patients with monogenic epilepsy and for common variants associated with polygenic epilepsy. The genes in the M30 network are expressed widely in the human brain under tight developmental control and encode physically interacting proteins involved in synaptic processes. The most highly connected proteins within the M30 network were preferentially disrupted by deleterious de novo mutations for monogenic epilepsy, in line with the centrality-lethality hypothesis. Analysis of M30 expression revealed consistent downregulation in the epileptic brain in heterogeneous forms of epilepsy including human temporal lobe epilepsy, a mouse model of acquired temporal lobe epilepsy, and a mouse model of monogenic Dravet (SCN1A) disease. These results suggest functional disruption of M30 via gene mutation or altered expression as a convergent mechanism regulating susceptibility to epilepsy broadly. Using the large collection of drug-induced gene expression data from Connectivity Map, several drugs were predicted to preferentially restore the downregulation of M30 in epilepsy toward health, most notably valproic acid, whose effect on M30 expression was replicated in neurons.

conclusionsTaken together, our results suggest targeting the expression of M30 as a potential new therapeutic strategy in epilepsy.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnimalsAnticonvulsantsDisease Models, AnimalEpilepsyEpilepsy, Temporal LobeGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMiceMultifactorial InheritanceMutationNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelAnticonvulsantsNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelScn1a protein, mouseCo-expressionEpilepsyEpileptic encephalopathyProtein-protein interactionsRegulatory networkSCN1ASystems geneticsValproic acid

Identifiers

PMID27955713
PMCPMC5154105
OpenAlexW2558040375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.