Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27955688›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

The RESPITE trial: remifentanil intravenously administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus pethidine intramuscular injection for pain relief in labour: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Matthew Wilson, Christine MacArthur, Fang Gao Smith, Leanne Homer, Kelly Handley, Jane Daniels, RESPITE Collaborative Group

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew WilsonAnaesthesia, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 4DA, UK.
Christine MacArthurMaternal and Child Epidemiology, Public Health Building, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Fang Gao SmithAnaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Perioperative, Critical Care and Trauma Trials Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, Centre of Translational Inflammation Research, University of Birmingham Research Laboratories, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK.
Leanne HomerBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit (BCTU), Public Health Building, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Kelly HandleyBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit (BCTU), Public Health Building, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Jane DanielsBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit (BCTU), Public Health Building, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. j.p.daniels@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3324-6771
RESPITE Collaborative Group
University of Birmingham · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-CS-011-030Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe commonest opioid used for pain relief in labour is pethidine (meperidine); however, its effectiveness has long been challenged and the drug has known side effects including maternal sedation, nausea and potential transfer across the placenta to the foetus. Over a third of women receiving pethidine require an epidural due to inadequate pain relief. Epidural analgesia increases the risk of an instrumental vaginal delivery and its associated effects. Therefore, there is a clear need for a safe, effective, alternative analgesic to pethidine. Evidence suggests that remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) reduces epidural conversion rates compared to pethidine; however, no trial has yet investigated this as a primary endpoint. We are, therefore, comparing pethidine intramuscular injection to remifentanil PCA in a randomised controlled trial. METHODS/

designWomen in established labour, requesting systemic opioid pain relief, will be randomised to either intravenously administered remifentanil PCA (intervention) or pethidine intramuscular injection (control) in an unblinded, 1:1 individual randomised trial. Following informed consent, 400 women in established labour, who request systemic opioid pain relief, from NHS Trusts across England will undergo a minimised randomisation by a computer or automated telephone system to either pethidine or remifentanil. In order to balance the groups this minimisation is based on four parameters; parity (nulliparous versus multiparous), maternal age (<20, 20 < 30, 30 < 40, 40+ years), ethnicity (South Asian (Pakistani/Indian/Bangladeshi) versus Other) and induced versus spontaneous labour. The effectiveness of pain relief provided by each technique will be recorded every 30 min after time zero, until epidural placement, delivery or transfer to theatre, quantified by Visual Analogue Scale. Incidence of maternal side effects including sedation, delivery mode, foetal distress requiring delivery, neonatal status at delivery and rate of initiation of breastfeeding within the first hour of birth will also be recorded. Maternal satisfaction with her childbirth experience will be determined by a postpartum questionnaire prior to discharge from the delivery ward. DISCUSSION: The RESPITE trial's primary outcome is the proportion of women who have an epidural placed for pain relief in labour in each arm.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials registration number: ISRCTN29654603 . Registered on 23 July 2013.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesia, ObstetricalAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidClinical ProtocolsEnglandFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousInjections, IntramuscularLabor PainMeperidinePain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPiperidinesPregnancyAnalgesics, OpioidMeperidinePiperidinesRemifentanilChildbirthEpiduralLabourPain reliefPethidineRemifentanil

Identifiers

PMID27955688
PMCPMC5153689
OpenAlexW2563278350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.