Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27943516›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Adaptive smoothing based on Gaussian processes regression increases the sensitivity and specificity of fMRI data.

Francesca Strappini, Elad Gilboa, Sabrina Pitzalis, Kendrick Kay, Mark McAvoy, Arye Nehorai, Abraham Z Snyder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical application of advanced MR methods in children: points to consider.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesca StrappiniDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in Saint Louis, School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-4371-6995
Elad GilboaPreston M. Green Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Sabrina PitzalisCognitive and Motor Rehabilitation Unit, Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, 00179, Italy.
Kendrick KayDepartment of Psychology, Washington University in Saint Louis, School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Mark McAvoyDepartment of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Arye NehoraiPreston M. Green Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Abraham Z SnyderDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in Saint Louis, School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.

Funding

NINDS CENTER CORE FOR BRAIN IMAGINGP30NS098577 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HERSHEY, TAMARA G, MARCUS, DANIEL SCOTT · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS098577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal and spatial filtering of fMRI data is often used to improve statistical power. However, conventional methods, such as smoothing with fixed-width Gaussian filters, remove fine-scale structure in the data, necessitating a tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity. Specifically, smoothing may increase sensitivity (reduce noise and increase statistical power) but at the cost loss of specificity in that fine-scale structure in neural activity patterns is lost. Here, we propose an alternative smoothing method based on Gaussian processes (GP) regression for single subjects fMRI experiments. This method adapts the level of smoothing on a voxel by voxel basis according to the characteristics of the local neural activity patterns. GP-based fMRI analysis has been heretofore impractical owing to computational demands. Here, we demonstrate a new implementation of GP that makes it possible to handle the massive data dimensionality of the typical fMRI experiment. We demonstrate how GP can be used as a drop-in replacement to conventional preprocessing steps for temporal and spatial smoothing in a standard fMRI pipeline. We present simulated and experimental results that show the increased sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional smoothing strategies. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1438-1459, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Brain MappingNormal DistributionSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBrainComputer SimulationFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, StatisticalReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityclassificationdenoisingearly visual areasfMRI smoothingGaussian processes regressionmultivoxel pattern analysisretinotopic mappingsearchlightvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID27943516
PMCPMC6867115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.