Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27943511›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2017

How do text-messaging smoking cessation interventions confer benefit? A multiple mediation analysis of Text2Quit.

Bettina B Hoeppner, Susanne S Hoeppner, Lorien C Abroms

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03800719 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Personalized Support Using Instant Messaging Applications to Increase Smoking Cessation in Smokers Proactively Recruited From Smoking Hotspots in Hong Kong: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2018 to 2020Enrolled696ConditionsSmoking CessationArmsAWARD advice, Health warning leaflet, Active referral to smoking cessation (SC) services, Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM), Psychosocial support and referral to SC services through IM
NCT05212220 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Low-intensity Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) for Smoking Cessation Intervention and Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation: a Randomized Controlled Trial Nested Within an EMA-based Observational Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2023Enrolled459ConditionsSmoking CessationArmsEMA-based intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Mobile Chat Messaging for Preventing Smoking Relapse Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in severe mental illness: A timely diagnosis to advance the process of quitting smoking.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021
    Trial
  11. Feasibility of a Smartphone-Based Tobacco Treatment for HIV-Infected Smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bettina B HoeppnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Susanne S HoeppnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lorien C AbromsDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Harvard University · USMilken Institute · US

Funding

Dynamic Processes of Smoking CessationK01DA027097 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOEPPNER, BETTINA B. · 2010 to 2014
$834k
Using Email to Enhance Counseling Services at NCI's Smoking Cessation QuitlineK07CA124579 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ABROMS, LORIEN C · 2008 to 2012
$751k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA124579NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA027097NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA025511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo determine the degree to which the observed benefit of Text2Quit was accounted for by psychosocial mechanisms derived from its quit smoking messaging versus from the use of extra-programmatic smoking cessation treatments and services.

designProspective, multiple mediation model of a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

settingUnited States nation-wide.

participantsA total of 409 adult daily smokers participated. Participants were, on average, 35 years of age, predominantly female (68%), white (79%), lacked a college degree (70%), had medium nicotine dependence (average Fagerström Nicotine Dependence Score score of 5.2) and more than half (62%) had made a previous quit attempt.

interventionAdult daily smokers browsing the web for smoking cessation support (n = 409; recruited 19 May2011-10 July 2012) were randomized to receive smoking cessation support via Text2Quit versus a smoking cessation material. MEASUREMENTS: Mediators (i.e. changes in psychosocial constructs of health behavior change, use of extra-programmatic treatment) were assessed at 1 month using single-item measures and outcome (i.e. self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence) at 6-month follow-up.

findingsMediators accounted for 35% of the effect of Text2Quit on smoking cessation. Only psychosocial mechanisms had complete mediational paths, with increases in self-efficacy [b = 0.10 (0.06-0.15)], quitting know-how [b = 0.07 (0.03-0.11)] and the sense that someone cared [b = 0.06 (0.01-0.11)], partially explaining the conferred benefit of Text2Quit. Use of outside resources, including treatments promoted explicitly by Text2Quit, i.e. medication [b = 0.001 (-0.01 to 0.01), quitline [b = -0.002 (-0.01 to 0.04)], treatments and resources not promoted by Text2Quit, i.e. online forums [b = 0.01 (-0.01 to 0.04)] and self-help materials [b = -0.01 (-0.04 to 0.02)], did not have complete mediational paths. An interaction effect existed for medication use that suggested that for participants not using medication, Text2Quit conferred substantial benefit, but not for participants using medication.

conclusionsText-messaging programs for smoking cessation appear primarily to confer benefit by promoting improvements in the psychosocial processes related to quitting rather than through the use of extra-programmatic smoking cessation treatments and services.

Indexed as

Text MessagingAdultFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf EfficacySmokingSmoking CessationTobacco SmokingTobacco Use DisorderUnited StatesMechanisms of changemediationmhealthmobile healthsmoking cessationtext-messaging

Identifiers

PMID27943511
PMCPMC6067921
OpenAlexW2552782042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.