Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27943311›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical virology2017

FV-100 versus valacyclovir for the prevention of post-herpetic neuralgia and the treatment of acute herpes zoster-associated pain: A randomized-controlled trial.

Stephen K Tyring, Patricia Lee, Gordon T Hill, Joel C Silverfield, Angela Yen Moore, Theresa Matkovits, John Sullivan-Bolyai

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical virology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. [StagingZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Herpes Zoster in the Older Adult.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen K TyringUniversity of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, Texas.
Patricia LeeCenter for Clinical Studies, Webster, Texas.
Gordon T HillOakwell Clinical Research, LLC, San Antonio, Texas.
Joel C SilverfieldBay Care Medical Group, Inc., Health Point Medical Group, Inc., Burnette and Silverfield MDS, Tampa, Florida.
Angela Yen MooreArlington Center for Dermatology, Arlington Research Center, Arlington, Texas.
Theresa MatkovitsContraVir Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Edison, New Jersey.
John Sullivan-BolyaiContraVir Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Edison, New Jersey.
Edison Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USArlington Center for Dermatology · USCenter for Clinical Studies · USPinnacle Clinical Research · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of FV-100 with valacyclovir for reducing pain associated with acute herpes zoster (HZ). Patients, ≥50 years of age, diagnosed with HZ within 72 h of lesion appearance who had HZ-associated pain, were randomized 1:1:1 to a 7-day course of either FV-100 200 mg QD (n = 117), FV-100 400 mg QD (n = 116), or valacyclovir 1000 mg TID (n =117). Efficacy was evaluated on the basis of the burden of illness (BOI; Zoster Brief Pain Inventory scores); incidence and duration of clinically significant pain (CSP); pain scores; incidence and severity of post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN); and times to full lesion crusting and to lesion healing. Safety was evaluated on the basis of adverse event (AE)/SAE profiles, changes in laboratory and vital signs values, and results of electrocardiograms. The burden of illness scores for pain through 30 days were 114.5, 110.3, and 118.0 for FV-100 200 mg, FV-100 400 mg, and valacyclovir 3000 mg, respectively. The incidences of PHN at 90 days for FV-100 200 mg, FV-100 400 mg, and valacyclovir 3000 mg were 17.8%, 12.4%, and 20.2%, respectively. Adverse event and SAE profiles of the two FV-100 and the valacyclovir groups were similar and no untoward signals or trends were evident. These results demonstrate a potential for FV-100 as an antiviral for the treatment of shingles that could both reduce the pain burden of the acute episode and reduce the incidence of PHN compared with available treatments.

Indexed as

AcyclovirAgedAged, 80 and overAntiviral AgentsCost of IllnessDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHerpes ZosterHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgia, PostherpeticPainPain ManagementProspective StudiesPyrimidine NucleosidesAcyclovirAntiviral AgentsFV-100Pyrimidine NucleosidesValacyclovirValineantiviral agentsherpes simplex virusherpes virusreinfection

Identifiers

PMID27943311
PMCPMC6139434
OpenAlexW2562288467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.