Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27943277›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2018

The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Evaluation Study: Impact on Mental Health Financial Requirements among Commercial "Carve-In" Plans.

Sarah A Friedman, Amber G Thalmayer, Francisca Azocar, Haiyong Xu, Jessica M Harwood, Michael K Ong, Laura Lambert Johnson, Susan L Ettner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A FriedmanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Amber G ThalmayerOptum, United Health Group, Minneapolis, MN.
Francisca AzocarOptum, United Health Group, San Francisco, CA.
Haiyong XuDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Jessica M HarwoodDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Michael K OngDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Laura Lambert JohnsonOptum, United Health Group, Minneapolis, MN.
Susan L EttnerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUnitedHealth Group (United States) · USFielding Graduate University · USOptum (United States) · USUCLA Health · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteTL1TR000121 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$2.7M
Parity and Addiction Act: Impact on Benefits, Use and CostsR01DA032619 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ETTNER, SUSAN LOUISE · 2012 to 2015
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000121NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDid mental health cost-sharing decrease following implementation of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA)? DATA SOURCE: Specialty mental health copayments, coinsurance, and deductibles, 2008-2013, were obtained from benefits databases for "carve-in" plans from a national commercial managed behavioral health organization. STUDY

designBivariate and regression-adjusted analyses compare the probability of use and (conditional) level of cost-sharing pre- and postparity. An interaction term is added to compare differential levels of pre- and postparity cost-sharing changes for plans that were and were not already at parity pre-MHPAEA.

findingsControlling for employer/plan characteristics, MHPAEA is associated with higher intermediate care copayments ($15.9) but lower outpatient ($2.6) copayments among in-network-only plans. Among plans with in- and out-of-network benefits, MHPAEA is associated with lower inpatient ($23.2) and outpatient ($2.5) copayments, but increases in inpatient and intermediate in-network and out-of-network coinsurance (about 1 percentage point). Among the few plans not at parity pre-MHPAEA, changes in use and level of cost-sharing associated with MHPAEA were more dramatic.

conclusionMixed evidence that MHPAEA led to more generous mental health benefits may stem from the finding that many plans were already at parity pre-MHPAEA. Future policy focus in mental health may shift to slowing growth in cost-sharing for all health services.

Indexed as

Deductibles and CoinsuranceHealth Benefit Plans, EmployeeHealth ExpendituresHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, PsychiatricMental DisordersMental Health ServicesUnited Statescommercial insuranceMental healthparity

Identifiers

PMID27943277
PMCPMC5785319
OpenAlexW2561977787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.