ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2017
Significance and clinical characteristics of atrial fibrillation post epicardial access.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2020Pooled it
- 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.Heart rhythm · 2020Review
- 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEpicardial access (EpiAcc) has become an important adjunct for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation. We hypothesized that post-procedural pericarditis may lead to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), and therefore assessed the incidence and clinical impact of post-procedural AF in patients undergoing EpiAcc.
methodsWe reviewed the records of all patients who underwent EpiAcc as part of an ablation procedure between January 1, 2004 and July 31, 2014 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. AF occurrence was determined by clinical documentation or electrocardiographic recordings post procedure.
resultsEpicardial access was obtained in 170 pts (indication 110 VT and 60 PVC). The mean age was 53 ± 16 years and 122 (72%) were male. Seven (4.1%) patients developed AF within 7 days of the procedure, at a mean of 49 ± 18 h post procedure; it was paroxysmal in all patients with an average duration 6.0 ± 5.5 h (range 2-18). All patients spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm; but 3 needed rate control with AV nodal blockade (calcium channel blockers [n = 2] or beta blockers [n = 1]). One patient out of 60 who received intrapericardial steroids developed AF (2%), while of the 110 who did not receive steroids, 6 developed AF (5%) (p = 0.42). During average follow-up 2.3 years, there were no documented recurrences of atrial fibrillation in these patients.
conclusionAtrial fibrillation following epicardial access is infrequent. When it occurs, it tends to be paroxysmal in nature and without severe symptoms. Administration of intrapericardial steroids did not affect the rate of AF post procedure; further studies however are needed to define their role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.