Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27943103›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2017

Numerical study to indicate the vulnerability of plaques using an idealized 2D plaque model based on plaque classification in the human coronary artery.

Wookjin Lee, Gyu Jin Choi, Seong Wook Cho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wookjin LeeSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Gyu Jin ChoiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Seong Wook ChoSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea. scho@cau.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is one of the leading causes of death in the world. In this study, an idealized 2D plaque model based on plaque classification in the coronary artery is developed. When creating the idealized 2D model for each plaque type (fibrocalcic, FC; fibrofatty, FT; calcified fibroatheroma, CaFA; fibroatheroma, FA; calcified thin-cap fibroatheroma, CaTCFA; thin-cap fibroatheroma, TCFA), the cap thickness and stenosis by diameter were set as variables. In order to establish the correlation between each plaque type and plaque rupture, a numerical simulation was performed and the stress and stress gradient were reviewed to analyze the mechanical behavior. Results show that both the TCFA and CaTCFA plaque types, which have the smallest cap thicknesses of the different types of plaque, showed relatively high stress values in the thin membrane when compared with the FT type. The FT type is considered to be relatively stable since it does not have necrotic core or a thin membrane. With a stenosis rate of 50% and a cap thickness of 60 μm, the TCFA and CaTCFA types showed approximately 11 and 110% higher stress values, respectively, and 679 and 1568% higher negative stress gradient values, respectively. In other words, the plaque types with thin caps, which have weak load-bearing capacities, showed high stress values and high negative stress gradients in the radial direction. It is understood that this result could indicate the possibility of plaque rupture.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularComputer SimulationCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsElastic ModulusFinite Element AnalysisHumansModels, AnatomicPlaque, AtheroscleroticShear StrengthStress, MechanicalCoronary arteryFinite element analysisPlaque classificationPlaque rupture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.