Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27943008›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2017

Effects of exemestane and letrozole therapy on plasma concentrations of estrogens in a randomized trial of postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Jason D Robarge, Zereunesay Desta, Anne T Nguyen, Lang Li, Daniel Hertz, James M Rae, Daniel F Hayes, Anna M Storniolo, Vered Stearns, David A Flockhart and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects ofPharmacogenomics · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jason D RobargeDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Zereunesay DestaDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Anne T NguyenDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Lang LiCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Daniel HertzBreast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
James M RaeBreast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Daniel F HayesBreast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anna M StornioloIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Vered StearnsBreast Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David A FlockhartDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Todd C SkaarDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
N Lynn HenryHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr #3362, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. lynn.henry@hci.utah.edu.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMichigan Center for Translational Pathology · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

ZINC GLUCONATE GLYCINE LOZENGES &VITAMIN C EFFECTS ON COMMON COLDM01RR000042 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELSTROM, REBECCA L · 1985 to 2007
$40.8M
ZINC AND CA EDTA THERAPY OF PLUMBISMM01RR000052 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARSH, LAURA · 1985 to 2007
$37.3M
ZOSUQUIDAR TRIHYDROCHLORIDE DURING CONVENTIONAL INDUCTION AND POST-REMISSIONM01RR000750 · NCRR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI STORNIOLO, ANNA · 1985 to 2008
$25.5M
TAMAXIFEN PHARMACOGENETICSU01GM061373 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI FLOCKHART, DAVID ALASTAIR · 2000 to 2009
$17.0M
Indiana University Comprehensive Training in Clinical PharmacologyT32GM008425 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Zeruesenay Desta, Michael Thomas Eadon · 1992 to 2026
$7.7M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000042NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000052NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000750NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008425NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInter-individual differences in estrogen concentrations during treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) may contribute to therapeutic response and toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine plasma concentrations of estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), and estrone sulfate (E1S) in a large cohort of AI-treated breast cancer patients.

methodsIn a randomized, multicenter trial of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer starting treatment with letrozole (n = 241) or exemestane (n = 228), plasma estrogen concentrations at baseline and after 3 months were quantitated using a sensitive mass spectrometry-based assay. Concentrations and suppression below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were compared between estrogens and between drugs.

resultsThe ranges of baseline estrogen concentrations were <LLOQ-361 pg/mL for E2, <LLOQ-190 pg/mL for E1, and 8.3-4060 pg/mL for E1S. For E2, the frequency of suppression below the LLOQ was not statistically significantly different between AIs (exemestane: 89.0%, letrozole: 86.9%, p = 0.51). However, patients on letrozole were more likely to achieve suppression below the LLOQ of both E1 (exemestane: 80.1%, letrozole: 90.1%, p = 0.005) and E1S (exemestane: 17.4%, letrozole: 54.9%, p = 4.34e-15). After 3 months of AI therapy, the ranges of estrogen concentrations were <LLOQ-63.8 pg/mL, <LLOQ-36.7 pg/mL, and <LLOQ-1090 pg/mL for E2, E1, and E1S, respectively. During treatment, 16 patients had an increased concentration compared to the baseline concentration of at least one estrogen.

conclusionsLetrozole had greater suppression of plasma E1 and E1S than exemestane, though the response was highly variable among patients. Additional research is required to examine the clinical relevance of differential estrogen suppression.

Indexed as

AndrostadienesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsEstrogensFemaleHumansLetrozoleNitrilesPostmenopauseTreatment OutcomeTriazolesAndrostadienesEstrogensexemestaneLetrozoleNitrilesTriazolesBreast cancerEstradiolEstroneEstrone sulfateExemestaneLetrozole

Identifiers

PMID27943008
PMCPMC5429096
OpenAlexW2559984240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.