Observational studyClinical rheumatology2017
Maintenance of efficacy and safety with subcutaneous golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients with low disease activity who previously received TNF inhibitors.
Observational study in Clinical rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study was conducted to evaluate continued maintenance of the efficacy and safety of therapy by switching to subcutaneous golimumab (GLM-SC) in rheumatoid arthritis patients with low disease activity or remission who previously received a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. Thirty patients who had been treated with etanercept or infliximab were switched to GLM-SC in maintaining disease activity at a low level. The patients were divided into two groups through discussion with each patient, considering general condition and convenience: the low disease activity (LDA) group and the LDAq8w group, which included patients with low disease activity or remission who switched to 50 mg GLM therapy at 4- and 8-week intervals, respectively. The effects of the TNF inhibitors to GLM-SC switch were evaluated at 12, 24, and 52 weeks after switching. The mean DAS28-ESR and DAS-CRP values in the LDA groups (16 patients) and LDAq8w groups (14 patients) were maintained from baseline throughout the 52-week treatment period. DAS28-ESR remission (93.8 and 92.3%) rates were also maintained through week 52 from the baseline remission rate (75.0 and 78.6%) in the LDA and LDAq8w groups, respectively. Thus, both GLM-SC treatment regimens were effective in maintaining the clinical response achieved with LDA secondary to TNF inhibitors. No serious adverse events occurred, and the continuation rate at 52 weeks was 100% in both groups. Therapeutic efficacy is adequately maintained in most patients switching from TNF inhibitor to GLM-SC (50 mg/4-8 weeks). Patients receiving TNF inhibitor can seamlessly switch to GLM-SC without serious safety concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.