Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27942957›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2017

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community differences among European long-term observatories.

M-L Bouffaud, C Bragalini, A Berruti, M Peyret-Guzzon, S Voyron, H Stockinger, D van Tuinen, E Lumini, D Wipf, P Plassart and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M-L BouffaudAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
C BragaliniDepartment of Life Sciences and System Biology (DBios), University of Torino, 25 Viale Mattioli, 10125, Torino, Italy.
A BerrutiCNR-Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, UOS Turin (CNR-IPSP), Torino, Italy.
M Peyret-GuzzonAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
S VoyronDepartment of Life Sciences and System Biology (DBios), University of Torino, 25 Viale Mattioli, 10125, Torino, Italy.
H StockingerAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
D van TuinenAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
E LuminiCNR-Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, UOS Turin (CNR-IPSP), Torino, Italy.
D WipfAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
P PlassartAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
P LemanceauAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
V BianciottoCNR-Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, UOS Turin (CNR-IPSP), Torino, Italy.
D RedeckerAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France. dirk.redecker@inra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-4062
M GirlandaDepartment of Life Sciences and System Biology (DBios), University of Torino, 25 Viale Mattioli, 10125, Torino, Italy. mariangela.girlanda@unito.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities have been demonstrated to respond to a variety of biotic and abiotic factors, including various aspects of land management. Numerous studies have specifically addressed the impact of land use on AMF communities, but usually have been confined to one or a few sites. In this study, soil AMF assemblages were described in four different long-term observatories (LTOs) across Europe, each of which included a site-specific high-intensity and a low-intensity land use. AMF communities were characterized on the basis of 454 sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) rDNA region. The primary goals of this study were (i) to determine the main factors that shape AMF communities in differentially managed sites in Europe and (ii) to identify individual AMF taxa or combinations of taxa suitable for use as biomarkers of land use intensification. AMF communities were distinct among LTOs, and we detected significant effects of management type and soil properties within the sites, but not across all sites. Similarly, indicator species were identified for specific LTOs and land use types but not universally for high- or low-intensity land uses. Different subsets of soil properties, including several chemical and physical variables, were found to be able to explain an important fraction of AMF community variation alone or together with other examined factors in most sites. The important factors were different from those for other microorganisms studied in the same sites, highlighting particularities of AMF biology.

Indexed as

GrasslandSoil MicrobiologyAgricultureClimateDNA, Ribosomal SpacerEuropeMycorrhizaeDNA, Ribosomal Spacer454 pyrosequencingArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiITS2Long-term observatoriesSoil management intensity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.