ReviewClinical and experimental nephrology2017
Clinical features of CKD-MBD in Japan: cohort studies and registry.
Review in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunohistochemical study for the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules, and FGF23 and ACE2 in P. gingivalis LPS-induced diabetic nephropathy.BMC nephrology · 2021Article
- Parathyroid hormone and premature thymus ageing in patients with chronic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder in Asia.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- An introduction to CKD-MBD research: restart for the future.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for evidence-based medicine; however, cohort studies and registries provide an important information about risk factors and, hence, shed light on the target of laboratory parameters. The uniqueness of the current Japanese CKD-MBD guidelines lies in the lower target range of intact parathyroid hormone levels than those used in other countries, which is based on analyses of the nationwide Japan Renal Data Registry. Cohort studies were also useful in exploring risk factors of renal outcome in predialysis patients. It was revealed that low vitamin D status (very prevalent in Japan) and high fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) levels predict poor renal outcome. The reported association of FGF23 levels with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and heart failure observed in cohort studies may support the idea of adding the 4th component of CKD-MBD, namely, "LVH" to the three original components. When it is not feasible to conduct RCTs regarding intervention, we have no choice but to rely on observational studies with sophisticated analysis methods, such as facility-level analysis and marginal structural model minimizing indication bias. Observational studies conducted in Japan revealed that the side effects of medications for CKD-MBD, resultant compliance, and effective doses in terms of hard outcome in Japanese patients were found to be different from those in other countries. For example, the MBD-5D study confirmed the benefit of cinacalcet in terms of mortality despite its median dose of only 25 mg/day. These data are very helpful for future guidelines specific to Japanese patients with CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27942882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.