Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27942855›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2017

Functional neuroimaging of visuo-vestibular interaction.

R E Roberts, H Ahmad, Q Arshad, M Patel, D Dima, R Leech, B M Seemungal, D J Sharp, A M Bronstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Visual Attention Modulates Glutamate-Glutamine Levels in Vestibular Cortex: Evidence from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. V1 as an egocentric cognitive map.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Attention Networks in the Parietooccipital Cortex Modulate Activity of the Human Vestibular Cortex during Attentive Visual Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R E RobertsNeuro-otology Unit, Division of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK. ed.roberts@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3656-5906
H AhmadNeuro-otology Unit, Division of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Q ArshadNeuro-otology Unit, Division of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
M PatelNeuro-otology Unit, Division of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
D DimaDepartment of Psychology, City, University of London, London, UK.
R LeechComputational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
B M SeemungalNeuro-otology Unit, Division of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
D J SharpComputational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
A M BronsteinNeuro-otology Unit, Division of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK. a.bronstein@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-048Medical Research Council MR/P006493/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain combines visual, vestibular and proprioceptive information to distinguish between self- and world motion. Often these signals are complementary and indicate that the individual is moving or stationary with respect to the surroundings. However, conflicting visual motion and vestibular cues can lead to ambiguous or false sensations of motion. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore human brain activation when visual and vestibular cues were either complementary or in conflict. We combined a horizontally moving optokinetic stimulus with caloric irrigation of the right ear to produce conditions where the vestibular activation and visual motion indicated the same (congruent) or opposite directions of self-motion (incongruent). Visuo-vestibular conflict was associated with increased activation in a network of brain regions including posterior insular and transverse temporal areas, cerebellar tonsil, cingulate and medial frontal gyri. In the congruent condition, there was increased activation in primary and secondary visual cortex. These findings suggest that when sensory information regarding self-motion is contradictory, there is preferential activation of multisensory vestibular areas to resolve this ambiguity. When cues are congruent, there is a bias towards visual cortical activation. The data support the view that a network of brain areas including the posterior insular cortex may play an important role in integrating and disambiguating visual and vestibular cues.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMaleMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationVestibule, LabyrinthVisual CortexYoung AdultCaloricVestibularVisual dependencyVisual motionVisual–vestibular interaction

Identifiers

PMID27942855
PMCPMC5504268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.