Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27942784›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2017

[Introduction of Prehospital Emergency Ultrasound into an Emergency Medical Service Area].

C Weilbach, A Kobiella, N Rahe-Meyer, K Johanning

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prehospital FAST reduces time to admission and operative treatment: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Trial
  2. Implementing ultrasound in emergency medical services: assessing physician proficiency and training requirements.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Remote real-time supervision of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound: a feasibility study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022
    Observational
  7. Prehospital point-of-care emergency ultrasound: a cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C WeilbachAbteilung für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Rettungsmedizin und Schmerztherapie, St.-Josefs-Hospital Cloppenburg, Krankenhausstraße 13, 49661, Cloppenburg, Deutschland. christian.weilbach@kk-om.de.
A KobiellaAbteilung für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Rettungsmedizin und Schmerztherapie, St.-Josefs-Hospital Cloppenburg, Krankenhausstraße 13, 49661, Cloppenburg, Deutschland.
N Rahe-MeyerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Franziskus-Hospital Bielefeld, Kiskerstraße 26, 33615, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
K JohanningKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
St. Josefs-Hospital Cloppenburg · DEFrancis Hospital · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency ultrasound as part of the provision of emergency medical services using mobile devices offers great benefits regarding to some important questions related to the management of critically ill and injured patients in the prehospital situation where diagnostic resources are limited. The aim of this study is to determine whether the comprehensive introduction of prehospital emergency ultrasound examinations into a German Emergency Medical Services ("rescue services") area is both feasible and beneficial for patients.

methodsAll emergency physicians at a rural emergency physician base were trained in emergency ultrasound scanning techniques (FAST, FEEL, 14 h of instruction), followed by regular weekly training sessions of approximately 30 min. Over a period of 12 months, prehospital ultrasound examinations performed during emergency physician callouts at this base were documented and analysed.

resultsA total of 87 emergency ultrasound examinations were performed during 1343 callouts. Among these, focussed assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) was performed in 35 patients (40.2%) and focused echocardiography in emergency life support (FEEL) in 41 patients (47.1%). In 11 patients (12.6%), ultrasound scans were performed for other indications (e. g. to rule out urinary tract obstruction in a case of flank pain). One trauma patient's life was saved by the decision to transport him to the nearest hospital and once there directly to the operating room, based on the ultrasound finding of significant free intra-abdominal fluid (ruptured spleen and liver).

conclusionPrehospital emergency ultrasound can be introduced into an emergency medical service area as a diagnostic modality that provides benefits to patients. Emergency physicians have to be specifically trained and to participate in continuous education activities. Especially in rural areas with longer transport routes and journey times, the early diagnosis of for example massive intra-abdominal bleeding is critical for the patient's prognosis.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesAdultAgedClinical CompetenceEchocardiographyEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleGermanyHeart DiseasesHumansLife Support SystemsLung DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansRural PopulationAbdominal traumaEmergency ultrasoundHypotoniaPreclinical examinationPrehospital emergency ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID27942784
OpenAlexW2560100598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.