Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27942776›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2017

Percutaneous guided biopsy for diagnosing suspected primary malignant bone tumors in pediatric patients: a safe, accurate, and cost-saving procedure.

Antony Ceraulo, Antoine Ouziel, Emilie Lavergne, Lionel Perrier, Anne-Valérie Decouvelaere, Franck Chotel, Philippe Thiesse, Perrine Marec-Berard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In situ guidance for MRI interventions using projected feedback.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antony CerauloInstitut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatriques (IHOPe), 1, place du Pr. Joseph Renault, 69008, Lyon, France. antony.ceraulo@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4995-1494
Antoine OuzielInstitut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatriques (IHOPe), 1, place du Pr. Joseph Renault, 69008, Lyon, France.
Emilie LavergneClinical Research and Innovation Direction (DRCI), Cancer Center Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Lionel PerrierClinical Research and Innovation Direction (DRCI), Cancer Center Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Anne-Valérie DecouvelaereDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Franck ChotelDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital Femme-Mère Enfant, Bron, France.
Philippe ThiesseDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Center Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Perrine Marec-BerardInstitut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatriques (IHOPe), 1, place du Pr. Joseph Renault, 69008, Lyon, France.
Renault (France) · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon · FRHôpital Femme Mère Enfant · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous biopsy is the reference diagnostic procedure for adult musculoskeletal tumors. Its place in pediatrics is controversial and open biopsy remains recommended.

objectiveTo assess diagnostic performance and feasibility of percutaneous biopsy performed on children and young adults for suspected malignant bone tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a 5-year retrospective study including patients ≤21 years who underwent a bone biopsy for a suspected malignant bone tumor. We assessed diagnostic yield (percentage of analyzable biopsies), accuracy (percentage of accurate diagnoses among all analyzable biopsies) and efficacy (percentage of accurate diagnoses among all biopsies), costs, anesthetic requirements and sample availability for biomedical research. Patients diagnosed with an open biopsy were used to compare diagnostic performances, anesthetic requirements and costs.

resultsWe included 90 percutaneous and 27 open biopsies in 117 patients. For percutaneous biopsy, diagnostic yield was 95.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.8-98.7%), accuracy was 96.2% (95% CI 86.8-99.5%) and efficacy was 89.3% (95% CI 78.1-96.0%). There was no statistical difference with open biopsy (Fisher exact test, P > 0.05). Mean costs were reduced with percutaneous biopsy: €1,937 (standard deviation [SD] €2,408) versus €6,362 (SD €5,033; Mann-Whitney, P < 0.0001). Thirty-two of the 48 (67%) patients included in clinical trials and diagnosed with percutaneous biopsy had suitable samples for ancillary analyses.

conclusionPercutaneous biopsy is a valid alternative to open biopsy for diagnosing pediatric and young adult primary malignant bone tumors.

Indexed as

AdolescentBiopsy, NeedleBone NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyInfantMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalMaleRadiography, InterventionalRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultAccuracyBone neoplasmChildrenCost analysisFine-needle aspirationPercutaneous core-needle biopsy

Identifiers

PMID27942776
OpenAlexW2560072770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.