ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2016
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allelic heterogeneity and abnormal vesicle recycling inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024Article
- The Cardiofaciocutaneous Syndrome: From Genetics to Prognostic-Therapeutic Implications.Genes · 2023Review
- Update on the Classification and Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Pediatric Cardiorenal Syndromes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Microbial-assisted and genomic-assisted breeding: a two way approach for the improvement of nutritional quality traits in agricultural crops.3 Biotech · 2020Review
- Systemic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging technologies.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2016Article
- Cutis Tricolor-Like Pigmentary Mosaicism in Mowat-Wilson Syndrome: Phenotypic Overlap With Ruggieri-Happle Syndrome.Pediatric dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methods(I) Review of the existing literature; and (II) information on our personal experience (clinical, laboratory and imaging data) on new cases with
resultsThe existing literature revealed 19 previous studies (35 cases) with pure cutaneous or syndromic cutis tricolor phenomena. Our personal experience included 5 unpublished patients (3 boys; 2 girls; currently aged 2 to 14 years) seen and followed-up at our Institutions in Italy who had: (I) skin manifestations of the cutis tricolor type (N=5); (II) skeletal abnormalities including small skull (n=2), obtuse angle of mandible (n=3), mild to moderate scoliosis (n=3), vertebral defects (n=3), and long bones bowing (n=3); mild psychomotor delay (n=3); epilepsy (n=2); anomalies of the corpus callosum (n=3); and cavum vergae (n =2).
conclusionsThis study further confirms and expands the overall phenotype of cutis tricolor. By literature review and personal experience we conclude that the skin abnormalities of the cutis tricolor type are stable over time; the skeletal defects are mild to moderate and do not progress or cause relevant orthopaedic complications; the neurological/behavioural phenotype does not progress and the paroxysmal events (when present) tend to decrease over time; there is a typical facial phenotype in some patients (long, elongated face, thick and brushy eyebrows, hypertelorism, deep nasal bridge with large bulbous nose and anteverted nostrils), which characterizes a somewhat distinct syndromic phenotype; some patients may develop early onset cataracts. The allelic dydymotic hypothesis of post-zygotic mutations likely involving the same gene loci could well explain the overall skin, bone, lens and nervous system phenomena of migration of different streaks of clones in the different tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.