Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27942422›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetic medicine reports2016

Expansion of the RASopathies.

William E Tidyman, Katherine A Rauen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetic medicine reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ClinGen's RASopathy Expert Panel consensus methods for variant interpretation.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The RASopathies: from pathogenetics to therapeutics.Disease models & mechanisms · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William E TidymanDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Behavioral and Developmental Pediatrics, University of California Davis, CA, USA; UC Davis MIND Institute, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Katherine A RauenUC Davis MIND Institute, Sacramento, CA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genomic Medicine, University of California Davis, CA, USA.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

The Role of Germline Mutations of the Ras/MAPK Pathway on Skeletal MyogenesisR01AR062165 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RAUEN, KATHERINE ANNA · 2012 to 2017
$2.1M
Elucidation of the genetic etiology of Costello SyndromeK23HD048502 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RAUEN, KATHERINE ANNA · 2005 to 2009
$609k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062165NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD048502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ras/mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is essential in the regulation of cell cycle, differentiation, growth, cell senescence and apoptosis, all of which are critical to normal development. A class of neurodevelopmental disorders, RASopathies, is caused by germline mutations in genes of the Ras/MAPK pathway. Through the use of whole exome sequencing and targeted sequencing of selected genes in cohorts of panel-negative RASopathy patients, several new genes have been identified. These include:

Indexed as

A2ML1LZTR1MAP3K8MYST4Noonan syndromeRASA2Ras/MAPK pathwayRASopathyRIT1RRASsignal transductionSPRY1SYNGAP

Identifiers

PMID27942422
PMCPMC5142630
OpenAlexW2472913205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.