Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27942415›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2016

Lung cancer: a rare indication for, but frequent complication after lung transplantation.

Dirk Van Raemdonck, Robin Vos, Jonas Yserbyt, Herbert Decaluwe, Paul De Leyn, Geert M Verleden

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05671887 (Double Lung Transplant REgistry Aimed for Lung-limited Malignancies), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05671887 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Double Lung Transplant REgistry Aimed for Lung-limited Malignancies (DREAM) - a Prospective Observational Registry Study for Patients Undergoing Lung Transplantation for Medically Refractory Cancers Confined to the Lungs

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2022 to 2032Enrolled125ConditionsLung Cancer, Bilateral Cancer, Lung TransplantArmsDouble Lung Transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2021
    Article
  11. Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Malignancy after lung transplantation.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Lung Transplantation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dirk Van RaemdonckDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Robin VosDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jonas YserbytDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Herbert DecaluweDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Paul De LeynDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Geert M VerledenDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung transplantation is an effective and safe therapy for carefully selected patients suffering from a variety of end-stage pulmonary diseases. Lung cancer negatively affects prognosis, particularly in patients who are no longer candidates for complete resection. Lung transplantation can be considered for carefully selected and well staged lung cancer patients with proven, lung-limited, multifocal, (minimally invasive) adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (previously called bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma) causing respiratory failure. Despite a substantial risk of tumour recurrence (33-75%), lung transplantation may offer a survival benefit (50% at 5 years) with best palliation of their disease. Reports on lung transplantation for other low-grade malignancies are rare. Lung transplant candidates at higher risk for developing lung cancer [mainly previous smokers with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or older patients] should be thoroughly and repeatedly screened for lung cancer prior to listing, and preferably also during waiting list time if longer than 1 year, including the use of PET-CT scan and EBUS-assisted bronchoscopy in case of undefined, but suspicious pulmonary abnormalities. Double-lung transplantation should now replace single-lung transplantation in these high-risk patients because of a 6-9% prevalence of lung cancer developing in the remaining native lung. Patients with unexpected, early stage bronchial carcinoma in the explanted lung may have favourable survival without recurrence. Early PET-CT (at 3-6 months) following lung transplantation is advisable to detect early, subclinical disease progression. Donor lungs from (former) smokers should be well examined at retrieval. Suspicious nodules should be biopsied to avoid grafting cancer in the recipient. Close follow-up with regular visits and screening test in all recipients is needed because of the increased risk of developing a primary or secondary cancer in the allograft from either donor or recipient origin.

Indexed as

complicationindicationLung cancerlung transplantation

Identifiers

PMID27942415
PMCPMC5124593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.