ArticleWorld journal of emergency medicine2016
Short lessons in basic life support improve self-assurance in performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Article in World journal of emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Virtual Reality for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Healthcare Professionals Training: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of healthcare simulation centers: development of the "STRIVE" tool using the Delphi method.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards basic life support among graduating class health science and medical students at Dilla University; a cross sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Study on the development and usage of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation time point recorder.World journal of emergency medicine · 2017Article
- Awareness of basic life support among Saudi dental students and interns.European journal of dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are several reasons why resuscitation measures may lead to inferior results: difficulties in team building, delayed realization of the emergency and interruption of chest compression. This study investigated the outcome of a new form of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training with special focus on changes in self-assurance of potential helpers when faced with emergency situations.
methodsFollowing a 12-month period of CPR training, questionnaires were distributed to participants and non-participants. Those non-participants who intended to undergo the training at a later date served as control group.
resultsThe study showed that participants experienced a significant improvement in self-assurance, compared with their remembered self-assurance before the training. Their self-assurance also was significantly greater than that of the control group of non-participants.
conclusionShort lessons in CPR have an impact on the self-assurance of medical and non-medical personnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.