ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2016
Letter to the editor regarding "Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis".
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Walking rehabilitation in incomplete spinal cord injury: evaluating the impact of robotic exoskeleton-assisted training.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Trial
- A Robot-Assisted Therapy to Increase Muscle Strength in Hemiplegic Gait Rehabilitation.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
- A Roadmap Towards Standards for Neurally Controlled End Effectors.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Robotic Rehabilitation and Spinal Cord Injury: a Narrative Review.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018Review
- Risk management and regulations for lower limb medical exoskeletons: a review.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.