Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27942103›Full record

ArticleNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association

Gentamicin-mediated ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity: A clinical trial study.

Parviz Saleh, Shamsi Abbasalizadeh, Saman Rezaeian, Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad, Reza Piri, Hojjat Hossein Pourfeizi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Therapeutic drug monitoring of antibiotic agents: evaluation of predictive performance.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parviz SalehChronic Kidney Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Shamsi AbbasalizadehWomen's Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Saman RezaeianDepartment of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad Naghavi-BehzadMedical Philosophy and History Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Reza PiriStudents' Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hojjat Hossein PourfeiziDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shohada Educational Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAminoglycosides and mainly gentamicin are the most important antimicrobial agents. Two different methods of administration exist: Single and multiple doses. There has always been a controversy about the less harmful administration method, to minimize adverse effects of gentamicin - deafness and renal insufficiency. In this study, it was aimed to compare two different methods of administration to figure out the least harmful treatment method. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn a clinical study, eighty patients aged 12-55 years who were admitted with sepsis syndrome were included in the study; they were divided into two groups: The first group received single-dose treatment (5 mg/kg) whereas the second group was treated with multiple doses (1.7 mg/kg three times a day) of gentamicin.

resultsThe results show that blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (CR) levels were decreased in the first group. Both blood urea nitrogen and creatinine and also mean glomerular filtration rate was increased in the same group. In the second group, mean BUN and CR levels were increased while the GFR was decreased in the same group. There was also a gradual increase in GFR in the first group. GFR <80 was decreased from 20% to 5.1% in the first group while increased from 5% to 27.5% in the second group. Results of audiometric studies show 6.1% hearing problem in the first group and 12.8% in the second one.

conclusionsResults of the present study showed that nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity are minimized in single-dose administration compared to multiples doses.

Indexed as

Aminoglycosidesdeafnessgentamicinrenal insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID27942103
PMCPMC5126748
OpenAlexW2554747002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.