Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27942102›Full record

ArticleNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association

Quality of acute asthma care in two tertiary hospitals in a state in South Western Nigeria: A report of clinical audit.

Olufemi Olumuyiwa Desalu, Adekunle Olatayo Adeoti, Olarinde Jeffrey Ogunmola, Joseph Olusesan Fadare, Tolutope Fasanmi Kolawole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Audit of Asthma Exacerbation Management in a Swiss General Hospital.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2023
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olufemi Olumuyiwa DesaluDepartment of Medicine, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Adekunle Olatayo AdeotiDepartment of Medicine, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria.
Olarinde Jeffrey OgunmolaDepartment of Medicine, Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria.
Joseph Olusesan FadareDepartment of Pharmacology, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria.
Tolutope Fasanmi KolawoleDepartment of Medicine, Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo audit the quality of acute asthma care in two tertiary hospitals in a state in the southwestern region of Nigeria and to compare the clinical practice against the recommendations of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe carried out a retrospective analysis of 101 patients who presented with acute exacerbation of asthma to the hospital between November 2010 and October 2015.

resultsMajority of the cases were females (66.3%), <45 years of age (60.4%), and admitted in the wet season (64.4%). The median duration of hospital stay was 2 days (interquartile range; 1-3 days) and the mortality was 1.0%. At admission, 73 (72.3%) patients had their triggering factors documented and 33 (32.7%) had their severity assessed. Smoking status, medication adherence, serial oxygen saturation, and peak expiratory flow rate measurement were documented in less than half of the cases, respectively. Seventy-six (75.2%) patients had nebulized salbutamol, 89 (88.1%) had systemic corticosteroid, and 78 (77.2%) had within 1 h. On discharge, 68 (67.3%) patients were given follow-up appointment and 32 (31.7%) were reviewed within 30 days after discharge. Less than half were prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a self-management plan, or had their inhaler technique reviewed or controller medications adjusted. Overall, adherence to the GINA guideline was not satisfactory and was very poor among the medical officers.

conclusionThe quality of acute asthma care in our setting is not satisfactory, and there is a low level of compliance with most recommendations of asthma guidelines. This audit has implicated the need to address the non-performing areas and organizational issues to improve the quality of care.

Indexed as

Asthmaauditemergenciesguidelinesmanagement

Identifiers

PMID27942102
PMCPMC5126747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.