ArticleScientometrics
Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators-a state-of-the-art report.
Article in Scientometrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biographical analysis of 32 pharmacologists persecuted under the Nazi regime: scientific careers between persecution, emigration, and new beginnings.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Reported methodological quality of medical systematic reviews: Development of an assessment tool (ReMarQ) and meta-research study.Research synthesis methods · 2025Article
- The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The SCOPE framework - implementing ideals of responsible research assessment.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Mapping Manuel Sandoval Vallarta (1899-1977) Scientific Contribution.Foundations of science · 2022Article
- Four challenges when conducting bibliometric reviews and how to deal with them.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Review
- Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not?F1000Research · 2020Article
- Article
- Scientific output scales with resources. A comparison of US and European universities.PloS one · 2019Article
- Measuring Individual Performance with Comprehensive Bibliometric Reports as an Alternative toJournal of Korean medical science · 2018Article
- Count highly-cited papers instead of papers withScientometrics · 2018Article
- Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph.ScientometricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bibliometric indicators such as journal impact factors,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.