Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27941898›Full record

ArticleNature nanotechnology2017

Targeted intracellular voltage recordings from dendritic spines using quantum-dot-coated nanopipettes.

Krishna Jayant, Jan J Hirtz, Ilan Jen-La Plante, David M Tsai, Wieteke D A M De Boer, Alexa Semonche, Darcy S Peterka, Jonathan S Owen, Ozgur Sahin, Kenneth L Shepard and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature nanotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krishna JayantDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Jan J HirtzDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Ilan Jen-La PlanteDepartment of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
David M TsaiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Wieteke D A M De BoerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Alexa SemoncheDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Darcy S PeterkaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7351-5820
Jonathan S OwenDepartment of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Ozgur SahinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Kenneth L ShepardDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Rafael YusteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Columbia University · USNew York University · US

Funding

Functional consequences of GABAergic inhibition of dendritic spines at pubertyR01MH100561 · NIMH · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SHERYL S · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
Two-photon optical control of astrocytic functionR01MH101218 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI YUSTE, RAFAEL · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic spines are the primary site of excitatory synaptic input onto neurons, and are biochemically isolated from the parent dendritic shaft by their thin neck. However, due to the lack of direct electrical recordings from spines, the influence that the neck resistance has on synaptic transmission, and the extent to which spines compartmentalize voltage, specifically excitatory postsynaptic potentials, albeit critical, remains controversial. Here, we use quantum-dot-coated nanopipette electrodes (tip diameters ∼15-30 nm) to establish the first intracellular recordings from targeted spine heads under two-photon visualization. Using simultaneous somato-spine electrical recordings, we find that back propagating action potentials fully invade spines, that excitatory postsynaptic potentials are large in the spine head (mean 26 mV) but are strongly attenuated at the soma (0.5-1 mV) and that the estimated neck resistance (mean 420 MΩ) is large enough to generate significant voltage compartmentalization. Nanopipettes can thus be used to electrically probe biological nanostructures.

Indexed as

Coated Materials, BiocompatiblePostsynaptic Potential SummationAnimalsDendritic SpinesElectrodesHippocampusMiceQuantum DotsCoated Materials, Biocompatible

Identifiers

PMID27941898
PMCPMC5901699
OpenAlexW2560111916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.