Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27941681›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Tools for Sequence-Based miRNA Target Prediction: What to Choose?

Ángela L Riffo-Campos, Ismael Riquelme, Priscilla Brebi-Mieville

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 230 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
230citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

230 citing papers in PubMed, 458 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association ofRadiology and oncology · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MicroRNAs in neurodegenerative diseases: from molecular mechanisms to clinical biomarkers, detection methods and therapeutic strategies-advances and challenges.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

170 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ángela L Riffo-CamposMolecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera, Avenida Alemania 0458, 3rd Floor, Temuco 4810296, Chile. a.riffo.c@gmail.com.
Ismael RiquelmeMolecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera, Avenida Alemania 0458, 3rd Floor, Temuco 4810296, Chile. ismael.riquelme@ufrontera.cl.
Priscilla Brebi-MievilleMolecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera, Avenida Alemania 0458, 3rd Floor, Temuco 4810296, Chile. priscilla.brebi@ufrontera.cl.
Universidad de La Frontera · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are defined as small non-coding RNAs ~22 nt in length. They regulate gene expression at a post-transcriptional level through complementary base pairing with the target mRNA, leading to mRNA degradation and therefore blocking translation. In the last decade, the dysfunction of miRNAs has been related to the development and progression of many diseases. Currently, researchers need a method to identify precisely the miRNA targets, prior to applying experimental approaches that allow a better functional characterization of miRNAs in biological processes and can thus predict their effects. Computational prediction tools provide a rapid method to identify putative miRNA targets. However, since a large number of tools for the prediction of miRNA:mRNA interactions have been developed, all with different algorithms, the biological researcher sometimes does not know which is the best choice for his study and many times does not understand the bioinformatic basis of these tools. This review describes the biological fundamentals of these prediction tools, characterizes the main sequence-based algorithms, and offers some insights into their uses by biologists.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansMicroRNAsMicroRNAsbioinformaticsDIANA toolsmiRandamiRNAprediction toolsTargetScan

Identifiers

PMID27941681
PMCPMC5187787
OpenAlexW2560678530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.