ArticleGenetics2017
Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive.
Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
151 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upper bound on the mutational burden imposed by a CRISPR-Cas9 gene-drive element.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Finding the perfect promoter for Cas9 in homing gene drives using single cell transcriptome data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Engineering resilient gene drives for sustainable malaria control by predicting, testing and overcoming target site resistance in Anopheles gambiae.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Integrating multiplexing into confineable gene drives effectively overrides resistance in Anopheles stephensi.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Advances in CRISPR gene drives for mosquito population control.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Seed dormancy shapes gene drive dynamics in plants.Nature plants · 2026Article
- Advancements in CRISPR-Cas Systems for Genome Editing towards Eradication of Human Microbial Pathogens.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Mapping Gene Drive Dynamics onto Mendelian Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Genetic Allee Effects for Controlling Invasive Populations.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Strategies to improve the efficiency of homing gene drives with multiplexed gRNAs.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Experimental Test of Evolutionary Safety of a CRISPR-Cas9 Gene-Drive Element.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Maximising Eradication Potential of Rat Gene Drives Using a Two-Target Homing Rescue Strategy: Spatial Modelling of Empirical Data.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Current trends in application of CRISPR/Cas9 in gene editing and diagnostics in Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs).Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Controlling the frequency dynamics of homing gene drives for intermediate outcomes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Genomic analyses revealed low genetic variation in the intron-exon boundary of the doublesex gene within the natural populations of An. gambiae s.l. in Burkina Faso.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- The potential of gene drives in malaria vector species to control malaria in African environments.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Population suppression by release of insects carrying a dominant sterile homing gene drive targeting doublesex in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Advancements and Future Prospects of CRISPR-Cas-Based Population Replacement Strategies in Insect Pest Management.Insects · 2024Review
91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive (CGD) promises to be a highly adaptable approach for spreading genetically engineered alleles throughout a species, even if those alleles impair reproductive success. CGD has been shown to be effective in laboratory crosses of insects, yet it remains unclear to what extent potential resistance mechanisms will affect the dynamics of this process in large natural populations. Here we develop a comprehensive population genetic framework for modeling CGD dynamics, which incorporates potential resistance mechanisms as well as random genetic drift. Using this framework, we calculate the probability that resistance against CGD evolves from standing genetic variation, de novo mutation of wild-type alleles, or cleavage repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ)-a likely by-product of CGD itself. We show that resistance to standard CGD approaches should evolve almost inevitably in most natural populations, unless repair of CGD-induced cleavage via NHEJ can be effectively suppressed, or resistance costs are on par with those of the driver. The key factor determining the probability that resistance evolves is the overall rate at which resistance alleles arise at the population level by mutation or NHEJ. By contrast, the conversion efficiency of the driver, its fitness cost, and its introduction frequency have only minor impact. Our results shed light on strategies that could facilitate the engineering of drivers with lower resistance potential, and motivate the possibility to embrace resistance as a possible mechanism for controlling a CGD approach. This study highlights the need for careful modeling of the population dynamics of CGD prior to the actual release of a driver construct into the wild.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.