Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27941104›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Motivation of Community Health Workers in Diagnosing, Treating, and Referring Sick Young Children in a Multicountry Study.

Armande K Sanou, Ayodele S Jegede, Jesca Nsungwa-Sabiiti, Mohamadou Siribié, IkeOluwapo O Ajayi, Asaf Turinde, Frederick O Oshiname, Luc Sermé, Vanessa Kabarungi, Catherine O Falade and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Quantifying and Valuing Community Health Worker Time in Improving Access to Malaria Diagnosis and Treatment.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Armande K SanouGroupe de Recherche Action en Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Ayodele S JegedeDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of the Social Sciences.
Jesca Nsungwa-SabiitiChild Health Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Mohamadou SiribiéGroupe de Recherche Action en Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
IkeOluwapo O AjayiDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics.
Asaf TurindeChild Health Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Frederick O OshinameDepartment of Health Promotion and Education, Faculty of Public Health.
Luc SerméGroupe de Recherche Action en Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Vanessa KabarungiChild Health Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Catherine O FaladeDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Josephine KyaligonzaChild Health Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Chinenye AfonneEpidemiology and Biostatistics Research Unit, Institute of Advanced Medical Research and Training, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Andrew BalyekuChild Health Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Joëlle CastellaniDepartment of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Melba GomesUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO/Special Programme for Research & Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity health workers (CHWs) are an important element of care provision for a wide range of conditions, but their turnover rate is high. Many studies have been conducted on health workers' motivation, focusing on formal sector staff but not CHWs. Although CHWs are easy to recruit, motivating and retaining them for service delivery is difficult. This article investigates factors influencing CHW motivation and retention in health service delivery.

methodsQuantitative and qualitative data were collected to identify the key factors favoring motivation and retention of CHWs as well as those deterring them. We interviewed 47, 25, and 134 CHWs in Burkina Faso, Nigeria, and Uganda, respectively, using a structured questionnaire. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were also conducted with CHWs, community participants, and facility health workers.

resultsExcept for Burkina Faso, most CHWs were female. Average age was between 38 and 41 years, and most came from agricultural communities. The majority (52%-80%) judged they had a high to very high level of satisfaction, but most CHWs (approximately 75%) in Burkina Faso and Uganda indicated that they would be prepared to leave the job, citing income as a major reason. Community recognition and opportunities for training and supervision were major incentives in all countries, but the volume of unremunerated work, at a time when both malaria-positive cases and farming needs were at their peak, was challenging.

conclusionsMost CHWs understood the volunteer nature of their position but desired community recognition and modest financial remuneration. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13858170.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBurkina FasoCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNigeriaUgandaVolunteersAfricacommunity health workermotivationretentionvolunteers

Identifiers

PMID27941104
PMCPMC5146697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.