Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27940919›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Massive dysregulation of genes involved in cell signaling and placental development in cloned cattle conceptus and maternal endometrium.

Fernando H Biase, Chanaka Rabel, Michel Guillomot, Isabelle Hue, Kalista Andropolis, Colleen A Olmstead, Rosane Oliveira, Richard Wallace, Daniel Le Bourhis, Christophe Richard and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Bovine Endometrium Drives and Responds to Divergence of In Vitro Produced Conceptus Biochemistry.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cloning by SCNT: Integrating Technical and Biology-Driven Advances.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Manipulating the Epigenome in Nuclear Transfer Cloning: Where, When and How.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Silencing of retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene RTL1 is the main cause for postimplantational failures in mammalian cloning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando H BiaseInstitute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820.
Chanaka RabelDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820.
Michel GuillomotUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Isabelle HueUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Kalista AndropolisDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820.
Colleen A OlmsteadDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820.
Rosane OliveiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820.
Richard WallaceDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820.
Daniel Le BourhisUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Christophe RichardUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Evelyne CampionUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Aurélie Chaulot-TalmonUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Corinne Giraud-DelvilleUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Géraldine TaghoutiUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Hélène JammesUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Jean-Paul RenardUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Olivier SandraUMR Biologie du Développement et Reproduction (BDR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alford (ENVA), Université Paris Saclay, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France.
Harris A LewinInstitute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820; lewin@ucdavis.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major unresolved issue in the cloning of mammals by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is the mechanism by which the process fails after embryos are transferred to the uterus of recipients before or during the implantation window. We investigated this problem by using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to compare the transcriptomes in cattle conceptuses produced by SCNT and artificial insemination (AI) at day (d) 18 (preimplantation) and d 34 (postimplantation) of gestation. In addition, endometrium was profiled to identify the communication pathways that might be affected by the presence of a cloned conceptus, ultimately leading to mortality before or during the implantation window. At d 18, the effects on the transcriptome associated with SCNT were massive, involving more than 5,000 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Among them are 121 genes that have embryonic lethal phenotypes in mice, cause defects in trophoblast and placental development, and/or affect conceptus survival in mice. In endometria at d 18, <0.4% of expressed genes were affected by the presence of a cloned conceptus, whereas at d 34, ∼36% and <0.7% of genes were differentially expressed in intercaruncular and caruncular tissues, respectively. Functional analysis of DEGs in placental and endometrial tissues suggests a major disruption of signaling between the cloned conceptus and the endometrium, particularly the intercaruncular tissue. Our results support a "bottleneck" model for cloned conceptus survival during the periimplantation period determined by gene expression levels in extraembryonic tissues and the endometrial response to altered signaling from clones.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, AnimalSignal TransductionTranscriptomeAnimalsCattleCloning, OrganismEmbryo ImplantationEndometriumFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalInsemination, ArtificialNuclear Transfer TechniquesPlacentaPlacentationPregnancyconceptusconceptus–maternal communicationplacentationsomatic cell nuclear transfer

Identifiers

PMID27940919
PMCPMC5187692
OpenAlexW2560318771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.