Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27940627›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Automatic identification of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure and their levels of severity from Italian General Practitioners' electronic medical records: a validation study.

Rosa Gini, Martijn J Schuemie, Giampiero Mazzaglia, Francesco Lapi, Paolo Francesconi, Alessandro Pasqua, Elisa Bianchini, Carmelo Montalbano, Giuseppe Roberto, Valentina Barletta and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Rosa GiniAgenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana, Osservatorio di epidemiologia, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6250-877X
Martijn J SchuemieDepartment of Epidemiology Janssen Research & Development, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.
Giampiero MazzagliaHealth Search, Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy.
Francesco LapiHealth Search, Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy.
Paolo FrancesconiAgenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana, Osservatorio di epidemiologia, Florence, Italy.
Alessandro PasquaHealth Search, Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy.
Elisa BianchiniHealth Search, Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy.
Carmelo MontalbanoGenomedics, Florence, Italy.
Giuseppe RobertoAgenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana, Osservatorio di epidemiologia, Florence, Italy.
Valentina BarlettaAgenzia regionale di sanità della Toscana, Osservatorio di epidemiologia, Florence, Italy.
Iacopo CricelliGenomedics, Florence, Italy.
Claudio CricelliItalian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy.
Giulia Dal CoAgenzia Nazionale per il Servizi Sanitari Regionali, Rome, Italy.
Mariadonata BellentaniAgenzia Nazionale per il Servizi Sanitari Regionali, Rome, Italy.
Miriam SturkenboomDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Niek KlazingaAcademic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Società Italiana di Medicina Generale · ITAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana · ITErasmus MC · NLServizio Sanitario Nazionale · ITAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLJanssen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Italian project MATRICE aimed to assess how well cases of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), hypertension, ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and heart failure (HF) and their levels of severity can be automatically extracted from the Health Search/CSD Longitudinal Patient Database (HSD). From the medical records of the general practitioners (GP) who volunteered to participate, cases were extracted by algorithms based on diagnosis codes, keywords, drug prescriptions and results of diagnostic tests. A random sample of identified cases was validated by interviewing their GPs.

settingHSD is a database of primary care medical records. A panel of 12 GPs participated in this validation study.

participants300 patients were sampled for each disease, except for HF, where 243 patients were assessed. OUTCOME MEASURES: The positive predictive value (PPV) was assessed for the presence/absence of each condition against the GP's response to the questionnaire, and Cohen's κ was calculated for agreement on the severity level.

resultsThe PPV was 100% (99% to 100%) for T2DM and hypertension, 98% (96% to 100%) for IHD and 55% (49% to 61%) for HF. Cohen's kappa for agreement on the severity level was 0.70 for T2DM and 0.69 for hypertension and IHD.

conclusionsThis study shows that individuals with T2DM, hypertension or IHD can be validly identified in HSD by automated identification algorithms. Automatic queries for levels of severity of the same diseases compare well with the corresponding clinical definitions, but some misclassification occurs. For HF, further research is needed to refine the current algorithm.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsHeart FailureHumansHypertensionItalyMyocardial IschemiaPredictive Value of TestsSeverity of Illness IndexDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYelectronic medical recordsPRIMARY CAREValidation study

Identifiers

PMID27940627
PMCPMC5168667
OpenAlexW2560782917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.