Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27940571›Full record

Trial reportAlcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)2017

Assertive Community Treatment For People With Alcohol Dependence: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Colin Drummond, Helen Gilburt, Tom Burns, Alex Copello, Michael Crawford, Ed Day, Paolo Deluca, Christine Godfrey, Steve Parrott, Abigail Rose and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Addiction Treatment: Who Needs It?Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement · 2019
    Review
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Colin DrummondAddictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, LondonSE5 8BB, UK.
Helen GilburtAddictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, London SE5 8BB, UK.
Tom BurnsDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, OxfordOX3 7JZ, UK.
Alex CopelloSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, BirminghamB15 2TT, UK.
Michael CrawfordCenter for Mental Health, Imperial College London, Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, LondonW12 0NN, UK.
Ed DayAddictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, LondonSE5 8BB, UK.
Paolo DelucaAddictions Department, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, LondonSE5 8BB, UK.
Christine GodfreyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, YorkYO10 5DD, UK.
Steve ParrottDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, YorkYO10 5DD, UK.
Abigail RosePsychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, LiverpoolL69 3BX, UK.
Julia SinclairClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, SouthamptonSO17 1BJ, UK.
Simon CoultonCentre for Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, KentCT2 7NF, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HTA/13/86/03Department of Health RP-PG-0609-10162Medical Research Council G0701681Medical Research Council G0701818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility and potential efficacy of assertive community treatment (ACT) in adults with alcohol dependence.

methodsSingle blind, individually randomized, pilot RCT of 12 months of ACT plus treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU alone in adults (age 18+ years) with alcohol dependence and a history of previous unsuccessful alcohol treatment attending specialist community alcohol treatment services. ACT aimed to actively engage participants for 12 months with assertive, regular, minimum weekly contact. ACT was combined with TAU. TAU comprised access to the full range of services provided by the community teams. Primary outcome is mean drinks per drinking day and percent days abstinent at 12 months follow up. Analysis of covariance was conducted using 80% confidence intervals, appropriate in the context of a pilot trial.

resultsA total of 94 participants were randomized, 45 in ACT and 49 in TAU. Follow-up was achieved with 98 and 88%, respectively at 12 months. Those in ACT had better treatment engagement, and were more often seen in their homes or local community than TAU participants. At 12 months the ACT group had more problems related to drinking and lower quality of life than TAU but no differences in drinking measures. The ACT group had a higher percentage of days abstinent but lower quality of life at 6 months. The ACT group had less unplanned healthcare use than TAU.

conclusionsAn trial of ACT was feasible to implement in an alcohol dependent treatment population.

trial registrationISRCTN22775534.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesAdultAlcoholismFemaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsSingle-Blind MethodYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27940571
PMCPMC5378220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.