Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27940490›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2016

Exploiting native forces to capture chromosome conformation in mammalian cell nuclei.

Lilija Brant, Theodore Georgomanolis, Milos Nikolic, Chris A Brackley, Petros Kolovos, Wilfred van Ijcken, Frank G Grosveld, Davide Marenduzzo, Argyris Papantonis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The macro and micro of chromosome conformation capture.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. FISH Going Meso-Scale: A Microscopic Search for Chromatin Domains.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lilija BrantCenter for Molecular Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Theodore GeorgomanolisCenter for Molecular Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Milos NikolicCenter for Molecular Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Chris A BrackleySchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Petros KolovosDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilfred van IjckenBiomics Department, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0421-8301
Frank G GrosveldDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Davide MarenduzzoSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Argyris PapantonisCenter for Molecular Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany argyris.papantonis@uni-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7551-1073
University of Cologne · DEErasmus MC · NLUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian interphase chromosomes fold into a multitude of loops to fit the confines of cell nuclei, and looping is tightly linked to regulated function. Chromosome conformation capture (3C) technology has significantly advanced our understanding of this structure-to-function relationship. However, all 3C-based methods rely on chemical cross-linking to stabilize spatial interactions. This step remains a "black box" as regards the biases it may introduce, and some discrepancies between microscopy and 3C studies have now been reported. To address these concerns, we developed "i3C", a novel approach for capturing spatial interactions without a need for cross-linking. We apply i3C to intact nuclei of living cells and exploit native forces that stabilize chromatin folding. Using different cell types and loci, computational modeling, and a methylation-based orthogonal validation method, "TALE-iD", we show that native interactions resemble cross-linked ones, but display improved signal-to-noise ratios and are more focal on regulatory elements and CTCF sites, while strictly abiding to topologically associating domain restrictions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusChromosomes, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsInterphaseK562 CellsMammalsModels, GeneticNucleic Acid ConformationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSequence Analysis, DNAchromatin loopingchromosome conformation capturecross‐linkingnuclear compartmentsnuclear organization

Identifiers

PMID27940490
PMCPMC5199122
OpenAlexW2559847019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.