Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27940314›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2017

Predicting dietary intake among children classified as overweight or at risk for overweight: Independent and interactive effects of parenting practices and styles.

Shelby L Langer, Elisabeth Seburg, Meghan M JaKa, Nancy E Sherwood, Rona L Levy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Adapting family-based treatment for paediatric obesity: A randomized controlled pilot trial.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2019
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Parenting Practices and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors in African American Families.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shelby L LangerCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA. Electronic address: shelby.langer@asu.edu.
Elisabeth SeburgHealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Bloomington, MN 55425, USA.
Meghan M JaKaHealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Bloomington, MN 55425, USA.
Nancy E SherwoodHealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Bloomington, MN 55425, USA.
Rona L LevySchool of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

Funding

Minnesota Obesity Prevention Training (MnOPT)T32DK083250 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KOTZ, CATHERINE M, LASKA, MELISSA N. · 2010 to 2024
$5.1M
Healthy Homes/Healthy Kids: Pediatric Primary Care-based Obesity PreventionR01DK084475 · NIDDK · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI LEVY, RONA L., SHERWOOD, NANCY E. · 2009 to 2013
$3.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK084475NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK083250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using baseline data from a randomized controlled pediatric obesity prevention trial, this study sought to examine general parenting style as a potential moderator of the association between feeding-specific parenting practices and child dietary intake. Four hundred and twenty-one parent-child dyads served as participants (49% girls and 93% mothers). Children were, on average, 6.6 years old and either overweight or at-risk for overweight (mean BMI percentile = 84.9). Data were collected in participants' homes. Study staff measured children's height and weight. Parents completed questionnaires designed to assess general parenting styles (authoritative, authoritarian and permissive) and child feeding practices (restriction and monitoring). Child dietary intake was assessed using a 24-h recall system. Outcomes were daily servings of fruits and vegetables, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), and unhealthy snacks. Results were as follows: Permissive parenting was inversely associated with fruit and vegetable consumption, and parental monitoring was inversely associated with SSB consumption. There were no other main effects of parenting style or feeding practice on child dietary consumption. Authoritarian parenting moderated the association between restriction and SSB intake (a marginally significant effect after correcting for multiple comparisons). Restriction was inversely associated with SSB consumption when authoritarianism was high but unassociated with SSB consumption when authoritarianism was low. Findings indicate that the parenting practice of monitoring child dietary intake was associated with more healthful consumption regardless of parenting style; interventions may thus benefit from encouraging parental monitoring. The parenting strategy of restricting child dietary intake, in contrast, was associated with lower SSB intake in the context of higher parental authoritarianism but inconsequential in the context of lower parental authoritarianism. This exploratory finding warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

AuthoritarianismBeveragesChildEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleFruitHumansMaleParent-Child RelationsParentingParentsPediatric ObesitySnacksSurveys and QuestionnairesSweetening AgentsSweetening AgentsChildrenObesityParenting styleRestrictive feedingSugar-sweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID27940314
PMCPMC5259556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.