Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27940186›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2017

Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study design: A trial with implications for efficacy, effect modification, and full continuum assessment.

Yamile Molina, Anne E Glassgow, Sage J Kim, Nerida M Berrios, Heather Pauls, Karriem S Watson, Julie S Darnell, Elizabeth A Calhoun

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Integration of Value Assessment and Social Network Methods for Breast Health Navigation Among African Americans.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yamile MolinaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60622, USA. Electronic address: ymolin2@uic.edu.
Anne E GlassgowUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60622, USA.
Sage J KimUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60622, USA.
Nerida M BerriosUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60622, USA.
Heather PaulsUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60622, USA.
Karriem S WatsonUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60622, USA.
Julie S DarnellLoyola University Chicago, 1032 W. Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60660, USA.
Elizabeth A CalhounUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60622, USA; University of Arizona, 550 East Van Buren Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USLoyola University Chicago · US

Funding

UIC CENTERS FOR POPULATION HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIESP50CA106743 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WARNECKE, RICHARD · 2003 to 2016
$19.3M
Research Education CoreU54CA202997 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CIECIERSKI, CHRISTINA, FEINGLASS, JOSEPH M · 2015 to 2024
$13.8M
Research Education CoreU54CA203000 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CIECIERSKI, CHRISTINA, FEINGLASS, JOSEPH M · 2015 to 2024
$12.4M
Understanding and preventing breast cancer disparties in LatinasP50CA148143 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI THOMPSON, BETI · 2010 to 2016
$9.7M
The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC)U54CA202995 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY · PI CIECIERSKI, CHRISTINA, FEINGLASS, JOSEPH M · 2015 to 2024
$9.5M
Research Training Education CoreP60MD003424 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI FERRANS, CAROL E. · 2009 to 2013
$9.2M
Training & Education CoreP20CA202908 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MATTHEWS, ALICIA K · 2015 to 2018
$858k
Empowering Latinas to Obtain Breast Cancer ScreeningsK01CA193918 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MOLINA, YAMILE · 2016 to 2020
$729k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA193918NCI NIH HHS P20 CA202908NCI NIH HHS P50 CA106743NCI NIH HHS P50 CA148143NCI NIH HHS U54 CA202995NCI NIH HHS U54 CA202997NCI NIH HHS U54 CA203000NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD003424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study objectives are to assess if navigation improves: 1) care uptake and time to diagnosis; and 2) outcomes depending on patients' residential medically underserved area (MUA) status. Secondary objectives include the efficacy of navigation across 1) different points of the care continuum among patients diagnosed with breast cancer; and 2) multiple regular screening episodes among patients who did not obtain breast cancer diagnoses. DESIGN/

methodsOur randomized controlled trial was implemented in three community hospitals in South Chicago. Eligible participants were: 1) female, 2) 18+years old, 3) not pregnant, 4) referred from a primary care provider for a screening or diagnostic mammogram based on an abnormal clinical breast exam. Participants were randomized to 1) control care or 2) receive longitudinal navigation, through treatment if diagnosed with cancer or across multiple years if asymptomatic, by a lay health worker. Participants' residential areas were identified as: 1) established MUA (before 1998), 2) new MUA (after 1998), 3) eligible/but not designated as MUA, and 4) affluent/ineligible for MUA. Primary outcomes include days to initially recommended care after randomization and days to diagnosis for women with abnormal results. Secondary outcomes concern days to treatment initiation following a diagnosis and receipt of subsequent screening following normal/benign results. DISCUSSION: This intervention aims to assess the efficacy of patient navigation on breast cancer care uptake across the continuum. If effective, the program may improve rates of early cancer detection and breast cancer morbidity.

Indexed as

MammographyMedically Underserved AreaBreast NeoplasmsChicagoEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHospitals, CommunityHumansPatient NavigationPatient SatisfactionPhysical ExaminationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID27940186
PMCPMC5274626
OpenAlexW2560417702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.