Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27940181›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2017

An intervention to reduce sitting and increase light-intensity physical activity at work: Design and rationale of the 'Stand & Move at Work' group randomized trial.

Matthew P Buman, Sarah L Mullane, Meynard J Toledo, Sarah A Rydell, Glenn A Gaesser, Noe C Crespo, Peter Hannan, Linda Feltes, Brenna Vuong, Mark A Pereira

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02566317 nacompletednot on this map

Stand & Move at Work: A Group Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorArizona State UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled630ConditionsObesity, Hypertension, DiabetesArmsSit-Stand workstation, Move
NCT04042610 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Office Worker Behavior and Health Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoma Linda UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled57ConditionsSedentary BehaviorArmsElectronic Prompt for Interrupting Sitting Time
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effect of Weight Goals on Sitting and Moving During a Worksite Sedentary Time Reduction Intervention.Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew P BumanSchool of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States. Electronic address: matthew.buman@asu.edu.
Sarah L MullaneSchool of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States.
Meynard J ToledoSchool of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States.
Sarah A RydellDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S. 2nd Street, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States.
Glenn A GaesserSchool of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States.
Noe C CrespoSchool of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States; Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182, United States.
Peter HannanDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S. 2nd Street, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States.
Linda FeltesState of Minnesota Management and Budget, 400 Centennial Office Building, Saint Paul, MN 55155, United States.
Brenna VuongFairview Health Services, 2344 Energy Park Drive, Saint Paul, MN 55108, United States.
Mark A PereiraDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S. 2nd Street, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States.
Arizona State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USFairview Health Services · US

Funding

Stand and Move at Work: A Group-Randomized TrialR01CA198971 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BUMAN, MATTHEW P, PEREIRA, MARK A · 2015 to 2018
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA198971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmerican workers spend 70-80% of their time at work being sedentary. Traditional approaches to increase moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) may be perceived to be harmful to productivity. Approaches that target reductions in sedentary behavior and/or increases in standing or light-intensity physical activity [LPA] may not interfere with productivity and may be more feasible to achieve through small changes accumulated throughout the workday METHODS/

designThis group randomized trial (i.e., cluster randomized trial) will test the relative efficacy of two sedentary behavior focused interventions in 24 worksites across two states (N=720 workers). The MOVE+ intervention is a multilevel individual, social, environmental, and organizational intervention targeting increases in light-intensity physical activity in the workplace. The STAND+ intervention is the MOVE+ intervention with the addition of the installation and use of sit-stand workstations to reduce sedentary behavior and enhance light-intensity physical activity opportunities. Our primary outcome will be objectively-measured changes in sedentary behavior and light-intensity physical activity over 12months, with additional process measures at 3months and longer-term sustainability outcomes at 24months. Our secondary outcomes will be a clustered cardiometabolic risk score (comprised of fasting glucose, insulin, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, and blood pressure), workplace productivity, and job satisfaction DISCUSSION: This study will determine the efficacy of a multi-level workplace intervention (including the use of a sit-stand workstation) to reduce sedentary behavior and increase LPA and concomitant impact on cardiometabolic health, workplace productivity, and satisfaction.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02566317 (date of registration: 10/1/2015).

Indexed as

ExercisePostureSedentary BehaviorWorkplaceAccelerometryBlood GlucoseBlood PressureCholesterol, HDLEfficiencyEnvironment DesignHumansInsulinInterior Design and FurnishingsJob SatisfactionTriglyceridesBlood GlucoseCholesterol, HDLInsulinTriglyceridesCardiometabolic healthCluster randomized trialPhysical activitySedentary behaviorSit-stand workstationsWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID27940181
PMCPMC5274555
OpenAlexW2560093137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.