Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27939962›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2017

Method for testing sustained attention in touchscreen operant chambers in rats.

Brittany Wicks, David E Waxler, Kyle M White, Nina Duncan, Joy Bergmann, Robert D Cole, Vinay Parikh, Debra A Bangasser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task (SAT) for Rats.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittany WicksDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
David E WaxlerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Kyle M WhiteDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Nina DuncanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Joy BergmannDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Robert D ColeDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Vinay ParikhDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Debra A BangasserDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States. Electronic address: debra.bangasser@temple.edu.
Temple University · US

Funding

Sex Differences in Stress Receptors Underlie Female Vulnerability to StressR00MH092438 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI BANGASSER, DEBRA A · 2012 to 2014
$732k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH092438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSustained attention, the ability to detect rare and unpredictable events, is central to cognitive performance. This construct can be tested in rodents using a Sustained Attention Task (SAT), where rats are trained to detect an unpredictably occurring signal (a brief light presentation) from non-signal events. The traditional version of this task utilizes an operant chamber with a central panel light for the signal and two retractable response levers. Adaptation of SAT to the increasingly popular touchscreen operant chambers, which do not have levers or fixed lights, could enhance the versatility of the task. NEW

methodHere we developed a touchscreen version of SAT where the light signal is presented in the center of the touchscreen, followed by a tone to indicate the beginning of the response period. Rats indicate their choice during this period by touching their nose to one of two touchscreen response areas. The remaining parameters were kept similar to the traditional version.

resultsRats acquired touchscreen SAT at a similar rate to the traditional version. As with the traditional version, shorter stimulus durations on the signaled trials reduced accuracy and the presence of a distractor (a flashing houselight) disrupted performance on the touchscreen version. COMPARISON TO EXISTING

methodCollectively, these data suggest that the touchscreen version is comparable to the traditional version of the SAT, and is an equally valid way of measuring sustained attention.

conclusionsMany researchers with touchscreen chambers could easily implement our modifications in order to study sustained attention.

Indexed as

TouchAnimalsAttentionChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantMalePsychomotor PerformanceRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReinforcement ScheduleRewardStatistics, NonparametricAttentionCognitionOperant testingTouchscreenVigilance

Identifiers

PMID27939962
PMCPMC5300756
OpenAlexW2559952523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.