ArticlePregnancy hypertension2016
Prevalence of pregnancy hypertensive disorders in Mongolia.
Article in Pregnancy hypertension, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential impacts of pregnancy-induced hypertension and chronic hypertension on maternal and foetal health outcomes: a systematic review of outcomes and risk factors.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Pooled it
- Global prevalence of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- From Local Evidence to Regional Leadership: Post-Preeclampsia Care in Thailand.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Article
- Changes in Vascular Function from Preconception to Postpartum Among Mongolian Women.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2022Article
- A Review of the Potential Benefits of Increasing Vitamin D Status in Mongolian Adults through Food Fortification and Vitamin D Supplementation.Nutrients · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of preeclampsia in a contemporary population of Mongolian women living in urban and rural areas. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis based on established diagnostic criteria and assessed whether local diagnostic criteria were similar to those used in the US. STUDY
designCross-sectional study of urban and nomadic pregnant women recruited in Ulaanbaatar (n=136) and rural provinces (n=85).
main outcome measuresPreeclampsia defined as hypertension new to pregnancy after 20weeks and proteinuria (or protein creatinine ratio ⩾0.3 and dipstick reading>+1) or in the absence of proteinuria, hypertension and onset of: renal insufficiency, impaired liver function, thrombocytopenia, pulmonary edema, cerebral/visual symptoms. Prevalence of preeclampsia based on established criteria was compared with prevalence based on local physician's diagnosis.
resultsPrevalence of local physician diagnosed preeclampsia was 9.5% (13.2% urban, 3.5% rural). Prevalence based on established diagnostic criteria was 4.1% (4.4% urban, 3.5% rural). Sensitivity of physician's diagnosis was 23.8%, specificity was 98.0%, false negative rate was 2.0% and false positive rate was 76.2%. While prevalence based on local physician's diagnosis was over double that based on diagnostic criteria, overdiagnosis did not result in adverse effects. Women fulfilling diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia had babies with higher birth weights than women who did not (p-value=0.006).
conclusionThe 4.1% prevalence of preeclampsia in Mongolia was consistent with global estimates of 2-8%, suggesting the pathophysiology of preeclampsia here may be similar to that found globally. Sensitivity of physician's diagnosis was low, specificity was high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.