Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27939476›Full record

ArticlePregnancy hypertension2016

Differences in cardiovascular function comparing prior preeclamptics with nulliparous controls.

Ira M Bernstein, Sarah A Hale, Gary J Badger, Carole A McBride

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy hypertension, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prepregnancy physiology and subsequent preterm preeclampsia.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ira M BernsteinObstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 89 Beaumont Ave, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, United States. Electronic address: ira.bernstein@uvm.edu.
Sarah A HaleObstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 89 Beaumont Ave, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, United States.
Gary J BadgerDepartment of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, United States.
Carole A McBrideObstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, 89 Beaumont Ave, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, United States.
University of Vermont · USUniversity of Vermont Medical Center · US

Funding

Prepregnancy Phenotype &Predisposition to Pre-eclampsiaR01HL071944 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BERNSTEIN, IRA MARK · 2004 to 2014
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL071944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the current study was to evaluate cardiovascular function; including blood pressure, cardiac output, pulse wave velocity and vascular compliance in nonpregnant nulliparous women compared to women with a history of preterm preeclampsia. STUDY

designThis was a case control study. Blood pressure was measured using the Finapres Pro. Baseline cardiac output was determined by echocardiography. Pulse wave velocity was estimated using simultaneous electrocardiographic tracings and ultrasound determined arterial flow waveforms and calculated as estimated distance divided by the time interval between EKG r-wave peak and ultrasound derived peak popliteal artery flow. During volume challenge, 500mL of lactated Ringers solution was infused through an indwelling antecubital catheter over 10min. Cardiac output and blood pressure during and 15min after the infusion were estimated using the Finapres Pro.

main outcome measuresIndices of arterial stiffness and vascular compliance.

resultsPrevious preeclamptics exhibited a significant increase in pulse pressure and cardiac output in response to volume challenge when compared with nulliparous controls. Prior preeclamptics had a strong positive correlation between blood pressure indices (r=0.50-0.68, p⩽0.01) and pulse pressure (r=0.58, P=0.008) with pulse wave velocity that was not evident in control women.

conclusionsIn women with prior preterm preeclampsia a relationship between blood pressure, intravascular volume and arterial stiffness, is evident in the nonpregnant state and in the absence of hypertension or overt cardiovascular disease. This supports an overarching hypothesis that nonpregnant physiology is an important contributor to pregnancy adaptations.

Indexed as

AdultBlood PressureBlood VesselsCardiac OutputCase-Control StudiesComplianceFemaleHumansPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPulse Wave AnalysisVascular StiffnessArterial stiffnessHypertensionPreeclampsiaPregnancyVascular compliance

Identifiers

PMID27939476
PMCPMC5157840
OpenAlexW2466894478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.