Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27939376›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2017

The Promises of Quantitative Proteomics in Precision Medicine.

Bhagwat Prasad, Marc Vrana, Aanchal Mehrotra, Katherine Johnson, Deepak Kumar Bhatt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Utility of Protein Markers in COVID-19 Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. The Impact of Serum/Plasma Proteomics on SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis and Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bhagwat PrasadDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, P.O. Box 357610, Washington 98195. Electronic address: bhagwat@uw.edu.
Marc VranaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, P.O. Box 357610, Washington 98195.
Aanchal MehrotraDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, P.O. Box 357610, Washington 98195.
Katherine JohnsonDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, P.O. Box 357610, Washington 98195.
Deepak Kumar BhattDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, P.O. Box 357610, Washington 98195.
University of Washington · US

Funding

PBPK prediction of ontogeny mediated alteration in hepatic drug eliminationR01HD081299 · NICHD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PRASAD, BHAGWAT · 2015 to 2025
$4.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine approach has a potential to ensure optimum efficacy and safety of drugs at individual patient level. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) models could play a significant role in precision medicine by predicting interindividual variability in drug disposition and response. In order to develop robust PBPK/PD models, it is imperative that the critical physiological parameters affecting drug disposition and response and their variability are precisely characterized. Currently used PBPK/PD modeling software, for example, Simcyp and Gastroplus, encompass information such as organ volumes, blood flows to organs, body fat composition, glomerular filtration rate, etc. However, the information on the interindividual variability of the majority of the proteins associated with PK and PD, for example, drug metabolizing enzymes, transporters, and receptors, are not fully incorporated into these PBPK modeling platforms. Such information is significant because the population factors such as age, genotype, disease, and gender can affect abundance or activity of these proteins. To fill this critical knowledge gap, mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics has emerged as an important technique to characterize interindividual variability in the protein abundance of drug metabolizing enzymes, transporters, and receptors. Integration of these quantitative proteomics data into in silico PBPK/PD modeling tools will be crucial toward precision medicine.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCarrier ProteinsHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPolymorphism, GeneticPrecision MedicineProtein TransportProteomicsTissue DistributionCarrier ProteinsPharmaceutical Preparationsdrug metabolizing enzymesindividualized drug therapypharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelsphysiologically based pharmacokinetic modelingpopulation pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamicsproteomicstransporters

Identifiers

PMID27939376
PMCPMC5313344
OpenAlexW2560295060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.