Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2793937›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1989

Formation of acetylcholine receptor clusters in chick myotubes: migration or new insertion?

J M Dubinsky, D J Loftus, G D Fischbach, E L Elson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Density and diffusion limited aggregation in membranes.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 1995
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Acetylcholine receptor-inducing activity stimulates expression of the epsilon-subunit gene of the muscle acetylcholine receptor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1991
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J M DubinskyDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
D J Loftus
G D Fischbach
E L Elson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiments were performed to study the feasibility of two mechanisms of acetylcholine receptor (ACHR) accumulation in chick myotubes: diffusion and trapping of previously dispersed surface receptors and localized insertion of new receptors at accumulation sites. Fluorescence photobleaching recovery (FPR) measurements indicated that the majority of diffusely distributed ACHRs in chick myotube membranes were mobile whereas nearly all receptors within high density clusters were effectively immobile. Unlike previous reports, two rates of ACHR movement characterized the mobile population. Moreover, we found that the estimated diffusion coefficient depended critically on the objective (spot size) used to assay recovery from bleaching. Implications of this finding for mechanisms of receptor immobilization are discussed. Extracts of chick brain, known to increase the number of surface receptors, did not alter receptor mobility. Extracts of Torpedo electric organ that increase the number of receptor aggregates, decreased the mobile fraction of ACHRs. Simulations of the diffusion and trapping mechanism indicated that captured receptors should congregate around the periphery of a receptor patch during the first hour after they were inserted into the membrane. However, newly inserted ACHRs were found to be located centrally within receptor patches under neurites, and this was not consistent with an exclusive diffusion-trapping mechanism. We also studied the mobility of ACHRs near points of contact made by cholinergic growth cones. The rate of receptor movement was increased in the vicinity of growth cones, but the magnitude of this effect was small.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCells, CulturedChickensElectric OrganMusclesReceptors, CholinergicTissue ExtractsTorpedoReceptors, CholinergicTissue Extracts

Identifiers

PMID2793937
PMCPMC2115820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.