Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27939309›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

Adhesion-Dependent Wave Generation in Crawling Cells.

Erin L Barnhart, Jun Allard, Sunny S Lou, Julie A Theriot, Alex Mogilner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Signaling and actin waves at a glance.Journal of cell science · 2025
    Review
  4. Mesenchymal cell migration on one-dimensional micropatterns.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Stick-slip model for actin-driven cell protrusions, cell polarization, and crawling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Erin L BarnhartDepartment of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jun AllardDepartment of Mathematics and Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Sunny S LouDepartment of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Julie A TheriotDepartment of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: theriot@stanford.edu.
Alex MogilnerCourant Institute and Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA. Electronic address: mogilner@cims.nyu.edu.
Stanford University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USNew York University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007365 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHUA, KATRIN F · 1985 to 2021
$33.8M
TRAINING & OUTREACH COREP50GM107615 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COVERT, MARKUS W · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
Modeling mitotic spindle assemblyR01GM068952 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MOGILNER, ALEXANDER · 2003 to 2014
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107615NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068952NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic actin networks are excitable. In migrating cells, feedback loops can amplify stochastic fluctuations in actin dynamics, often resulting in traveling waves of protrusion. The precise contributions of various molecular and mechanical interactions to wave generation have been difficult to disentangle, in part due to complex cellular morphodynamics. Here we used a relatively simple cell type-the fish epithelial keratocyte-to define a set of mechanochemical feedback loops underlying actin network excitability and wave generation. Although keratocytes are normally characterized by the persistent protrusion of a broad leading edge, increasing cell-substrate adhesion strength results in waving protrusion of a short leading edge. We show that protrusion waves are due to fluctuations in actin polymerization rates and that overexpression of VASP, an actin anti-capping protein that promotes actin polymerization, switches highly adherent keratocytes from waving to persistent protrusion. Moreover, VASP localizes both to adhesion complexes and to the leading edge. Based on these results, we developed a mathematical model for protrusion waves in which local depletion of VASP from the leading edge by adhesions-along with lateral propagation of protrusion due to the branched architecture of the actin network and negative mechanical feedback from the cell membrane-results in regular protrusion waves. Consistent with our model simulations, we show that VASP localization at the leading edge oscillates, with VASP leading-edge enrichment greatest just prior to protrusion initiation. We propose that the mechanochemical feedbacks underlying wave generation in keratocytes may constitute a general module for establishing excitable actin dynamics in other cellular contexts.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCell MovementModels, BiologicalActin CytoskeletonAnimalsCell Adhesion MoleculesCells, CulturedFishesFish ProteinsGene Expression RegulationKeratinocytesStochastic ProcessesCell Adhesion MoleculesFish Proteinsactin dynamicsactin wavesadhesion dynamicscell motilityexcitable systemkeratocyteleading edgeVASP

Identifiers

PMID27939309
PMCPMC5225140
OpenAlexW2559818799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.