Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27938826›Full record

ReviewGlobal heart2016

Can the Success of HIV Scale-Up Advance the Global Chronic NCD Agenda?

Anton M Palma, Miriam Rabkin, Harriet Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha, Pido Bongomin, Nomthandazo Lukhele, Xolisile Dlamini, Altaye Kidane, Wafaa M El-Sadr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global heart, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Multimorbidity after USAID.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anton M PalmaDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; ICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: anton.palma@columbia.edu.
Miriam RabkinDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; ICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Harriet Nuwagaba-BiribonwohaDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; ICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Pido BongominDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; ICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Nomthandazo LukheleSwaziland Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Swaziland.
Xolisile DlaminiSwaziland Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Swaziland.
Altaye KidaneICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Wafaa M El-SadrDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; ICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Global HIV Implementation Science Research Training Grant RenewalT32AI114398 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Yael R Hirsch-Moverman · 2014 to 2026
$4.1M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI114398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noncommunicable diseases (NCD) are the leading causes of death and disability worldwide but have received suboptimal attention and funding from the global health community. Although the first United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) for NCD in 2011 aimed to stimulate donor funding and political action, only 1.3% of official development assistance for health was allocated to NCD in 2015, even less than in 2011. In stark contrast, the UNGASS on human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) in 2001 sparked billions of dollars in funding for HIV and enabled millions of HIV-infected individuals to access antiretroviral treatment. Using an existing analytic framework, we compare the global responses to the HIV and NCD epidemics and distill lessons from the HIV response that might be utilized to enhance the global NCD response. These include: 1) further educating and empowering communities and patients to increase demand for NCD services and to hold national governments accountable for establishing and achieving NCD targets; and 2) evidence to support the feasibility and effectiveness of large-scale NCD screening and treatment programs in low-resource settings. We conclude with a case study from Swaziland, a country that is making progress in confronting both HIV and NCD.

Indexed as

Healthcare FinancingGlobal HealthHIV InfectionsHumansMorbidityNational Health ProgramsNoncommunicable DiseasesUnited Nations

Identifiers

PMID27938826
PMCPMC5157698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.